share_log

Everest Medicines Limited's (HKG:1952) Market Cap Dropped HK$542m Last Week; Retail Investors Bore the Brunt

Everest Medicines Limited's (HKG:1952) Market Cap Dropped HK$542m Last Week; Retail Investors Bore the Brunt

上海伊娃斯醫藥有限公司(HKG:1952)市值上週下跌了542百萬港元;零售投資者承受了壓力。
Simply Wall St ·  07/03 21:28

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Everest Medicines' significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 3 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Institutional ownership in Everest Medicines is 16%
  • 珂萊醫藥顯著的零售投資者持股表明,關鍵決策受來自大衆股東的影響。
  • 前三大股東擁有公司51%的股份。
  • 珂萊醫藥的機構持股比例爲16%。

If you want to know who really controls Everest Medicines Limited (HKG:1952), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 42% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想知道珂萊醫藥有哪些真正的控制權,則需要查看其股票名冊的構成。我們可以看到,零售投資者擁有公司的42%股份。也就是說,該集團在股票上升時最有利(或下降時最虧損)。

And following last week's 8.1% decline in share price, retail investors suffered the most losses.

在上週8.1%的股價下跌後,零售投資者遭受了最大的損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Everest Medicines.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了珂萊醫藥不同持股群體的比例。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:1952 Ownership Breakdown July 4th 2024
SEHK:1952持股結構拆分2024年7月4日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Everest Medicines?

機構持股告訴我們有關珂萊醫藥的什麼消息?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

Everest Medicines already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Everest Medicines' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

珂萊醫藥已經有機構進入股票名冊。他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份,這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這個股票並且喜歡它。但是就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。 當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,他們總是存在一個“擁擠的交易”的風險。當這樣的交易不順利時,多個當事方可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到珂萊醫藥的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是存在更多的方面。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:1952 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 4th 2024
SEHK:1952盈利和營收增長拆分2024年7月4日

Everest Medicines is not owned by hedge funds. CBC Group is currently the company's largest shareholder with 41% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 4.9% and 4.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

珂萊醫藥沒有被對沖基金所擁有。CBC Group是目前持有該公司41%的股份的最大股東。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股份的4.9%和4.7%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前3大股東共控制了公司股份的一半以上,這意味着他們有相當大的權力來影響公司的決策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Everest Medicines

珂萊醫藥的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that Everest Medicines Limited insiders own under 1% of the company. It seems the board members have no more than HK$58m worth of shares in the HK$6.0b company. We generally like to see a board more invested. However it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的信息表明,珂萊醫藥的內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。似乎董事會成員在這家市值6.0億港元的公司中的股份不超過5800萬元。我們通常喜歡看到董事會更投入其中。但是,檢查那些內部人員是否一直在購買股票可能是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 42% stake in Everest Medicines. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

通常是個人投資者的普通公衆持有珂萊醫藥的42%股份。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以影響其政策決策的結果,但他們仍然可以集體對公司政策產生影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With an ownership of 41%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

擁有41%的私募股權公司可以在塑造以價值創造爲中心的公司戰略中發揮作用。這可能會鼓勵一些投資者,因爲私募股權公司有時能夠鼓勵有助於市場看到公司價值的戰略。或者,這些股東可能在上市後退出投資。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Everest Medicines is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是很有價值的,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,珂萊醫藥在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警示信號,您應該知道……

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論