share_log

CureVac N.V.'s (NASDAQ:CVAC) Stock Price Dropped 7.3% Last Week; Individual Investors Would Not Be Happy

CureVac N.V.'s (NASDAQ:CVAC) Stock Price Dropped 7.3% Last Week; Individual Investors Would Not Be Happy

CureVac N.V.(納斯達克:CVAC)的股價上週下跌7.3%;個人投資者不會感到高興
Simply Wall St ·  07/04 07:52

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over CureVac by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Institutions own 21% of CureVac
  • 個人投資者對CureVac的顯著控制意味着公衆對管理和治理相關決策有更大的影響力。
  • 共有3位投資者佔公司的多數股權,擁有52%的所有權。
  • 機構管理着CureVac的21%的股份。

A look at the shareholders of CureVac N.V. (NASDAQ:CVAC) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 33% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

通過審視CureVac N.V.(納斯達克:CVAC)的股東,我們可以知道哪個群體最具影響力。 個人投資者擁有33%的股份,是該公司持股量最大的群體。 換句話說,這個群體面對最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And following last week's 7.3% decline in share price, individual investors suffered the most losses.

在上週7.3%的股價下跌後,個人投資者遭受了最大的虧損。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about CureVac.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於CureVac的什麼信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:CVAC Ownership Breakdown July 4th 2024
納斯達克GM:CVAC所有權分析(截至2024年7月4日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CureVac?

機構持股告訴我們什麼關於CureVac?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that CureVac does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of CureVac, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,CureVac確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的相當一部分股票。 這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。 但是,最好還是要警惕僅僅依靠機構投資者帶來的所謂認可。他們有時也會犯錯。 如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,則看到股價大幅下跌並不罕見。 因此,值得檢查CureVac的過去收益軌跡(如下)。 當然,也要記住有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:CVAC Earnings and Revenue Growth July 4th 2024
納斯達克GM:CVAC營收及收入增長圖表(截至2024年7月4日)

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in CureVac. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is dievini Hopp BioTech holding GmbH & Co. KG with 31% of shares outstanding. With 13% and 7.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, KfW, Asset Management Arm and GSK plc are the second and third largest shareholders.

我們注意到,對CureVac沒有重大投資的對沖基金。 從我們的數據來看,擁有公司31%流通股的是dievini Hopp BioTech holding GmbH & Co. KG。 其次,持有公司流通股13%和7.4%的是KfW,資產管理部門和GSk plc。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前3大股東共控制了公司股份的一半以上,這意味着他們有相當大的權力來影響公司的決策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of CureVac

CureVac內部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in CureVac N.V.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$47m worth of the US$700m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告內部人員擁有CureVac N.V.的股份。 作爲個人,內部人員共擁有該公司價值4700萬美元的股份。 這至少顯示一些對齊。 您可以單擊此處以查看這些內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 33% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆--包括散戶股東--擁有公司33%的股權,因此他們無法輕易被忽略。儘管這種所有權尺寸可能不足以使政策決策朝他們的方向傾斜,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With an ownership of 31%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

擁有31%的股權的私募股權公司具有塑造以價值創造爲重點的企業策略的能力。 有些人可能會喜歡這種情況,因爲私募股權公司有時是追求管理責任的活動家。 但是,有時,私募股權是在將公司公開後賣出的。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 7.4% of CureVac. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

我們似乎發現公共公司持有CureVac的7.4%。 很難說得準,但這表明他們擁有交織在一起的商業利益。 這可能是一個戰略性的股份,因此值得關注此領域的所有權變化。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand CureVac better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for CureVac that you should be aware of before investing here.

始終考慮持有公司股份的不同團體是值得的。 但是要更好地了解CureVac,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如,我們已經發現了CureVac的3個警告信號,您在投資此處之前應該注意這些。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論