share_log

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as PureCycle Technologies, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:PCT) Recent 9.8% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as PureCycle Technologies, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:PCT) Recent 9.8% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

隨着PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:PCT)最近的9.8%下跌加劇一年來的虧損,機構投資者可能會採取劇烈行動。
Simply Wall St ·  07/04 09:24

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies PureCycle Technologies' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 8 shareholders own 53% of the company
  • Insider ownership in PureCycle Technologies is 11%
  • 顯著的高機構持股意味着PureCycle Technologies的股票價格對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 前8大股東擁有公司的53%的股份。
  • PureCycle Technologies的內部持股爲11%。

Every investor in PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:PCT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 44% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

每一位PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (納斯達克代碼:PCT) 的投資者應該意識到最權威的股東群體。由於擁有44%的股份,機構是公司中持有最多股份的股東群體。也就是說,這個群體的投資對公司的收益(或虧損)影響最大。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 9.8% last week. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 49% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. Hence, if weakness in PureCycle Technologies' share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

機構投資者上週看到其持股價值下降9.8%。不用說,最近的損失加劇了股東一年內的49%的虧損,這可能會引起投資者的反感,特別是對於這類股東。機構又被稱爲"聰明的資金",他們對股票價格的波動有很大影響。因此,如果PureCycle Technologies的股價弱勢持續,機構投資者可能會感到被迫拋售股票,這對於個人投資者可能不是理想的結果。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about PureCycle Technologies.

讓我們仔細研究一下不同股東類型對PureCycle Technologies的影響。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:PCT Ownership Breakdown July 4th 2024
NasdaqCM:PCt所有權分解2024年7月4日。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About PureCycle Technologies?

機構投資者的持股情況對PureCycle Technologies意味着什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in PureCycle Technologies. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at PureCycle Technologies' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在PureCycle Technologies中擁有相當的股份。這可能表明公司在投資界有一定的信譽度。然而,還是要警惕過分依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂認可。他們也有時候會犯錯。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得注意的是PureCycle Technologies下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:PCT Earnings and Revenue Growth July 4th 2024
PureCycle Technologies的股份中似乎有18%是由對沖基金控制的。這是有趣的,因爲對沖基金可能非常活躍和積極。許多對沖基金尋找可以推高股價的中期催化劑。該公司最大的股東是Sylebra Capital Limited,持股比例爲18%。同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有公司股份的7.7%和5.9%。

It would appear that 18% of PureCycle Technologies shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. The company's largest shareholder is Sylebra Capital Limited, with ownership of 18%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.7% and 5.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我們的數據顯示,PureCycle Technologies的內部人員持有公司價值1億美元的股票,擁有US$1,00,00,000股份。但需要注意的是,該公司規模仍然很小;有些內部人員可能創立了這個企業。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人員是買入還是賣出。

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 53% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們深挖了一下,發現前8名股東持有公司註冊資本的約53%,這意味着除大股東外,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of PureCycle Technologies

公衆股東,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司15%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個群體不能完全掌控公司,但肯定對公司經營產生真正的影響。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然“內部人士”的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in PureCycle Technologies, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$899m, and insiders have US$100m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息顯示,內部人員在PureCycle Technologies, Inc. 中擁有大量持股。該公司市值僅爲8,990萬美元,內部人員自有的股份價值1億美元。我們認爲這顯示出他們與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然很小,有些內部人員可能是創業者。你可以點此查看他們是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

總體來說,公衆股東,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司15%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個群體不能完全掌控公司,但肯定對公司經營產生真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 6.8%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據顯示,私營企業持有公司股份的6.8%。如果有關聯方,如內部人員,在其中一傢俬營企業中持有利益,那麼這應該在年度報告中披露。私營企業也可能對公司有戰略利益。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 4.8% of PureCycle Technologies stock. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

上市公司目前持有PureCycle Technologies的股票4.8%。雖然我們不能確定,但這很可能是一種戰略押注。這些企業可能是相似的或者是合作伙伴。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand PureCycle Technologies better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - PureCycle Technologies has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

總會考慮到公司股份的不同持有群體,但要更好地了解PureCycle Technologies,我們需要考慮很多其他因素。例如,風險 - PureCycle Technologies有2個警告信號,我們認爲你應該了解一下。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論