share_log

Shanghai Industrial Holdings (HKG:363) Stock Performs Better Than Its Underlying Earnings Growth Over Last Five Years

Shanghai Industrial Holdings (HKG:363) Stock Performs Better Than Its Underlying Earnings Growth Over Last Five Years

上海興業證券(HKG:363)股票在過去五年中表現優於其基礎盈利增長
Simply Wall St ·  07/04 18:01

While not a mind-blowing move, it is good to see that the Shanghai Industrial Holdings Limited (HKG:363) share price has gained 12% in the last three months. But that doesn't change the fact that the returns over the last five years have been less than pleasing. You would have done a lot better buying an index fund, since the stock has dropped 28% in that half decade.

雖然並不是一個驚人的舉動,但很高興看到上海實業控股有限公司(HKG:363)股價在過去三個月中上漲了12%。但這並不能改變過去五年的回報不太令人滿意的事實。如果你買了指數基金,你會做得更好,因爲這支股票在這個半十年裏下跌了28%。

While the last five years has been tough for Shanghai Industrial Holdings shareholders, this past week has shown signs of promise. So let's look at the longer term fundamentals and see if they've been the driver of the negative returns.

儘管過去五年對上海實業控股的股東來說很艱難,但最近一週已經顯示出跡象。所以讓我們看看更長期的基本面,看看它們是否是負回報的驅動因素。

There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.

不可否認的是,市場有時是高效的,但價格並不總是反映潛在的商業表現。一個不完美但簡單的方法來考慮公司市場感知如何改變是比較每股收益(EPS)變化和股價變動。

During the unfortunate half decade during which the share price slipped, Shanghai Industrial Holdings actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 0.5% per year. So it doesn't seem like EPS is a great guide to understanding how the market is valuing the stock. Alternatively, growth expectations may have been unreasonable in the past.

在這不幸的半十年期間,股票價格下跌的同時,上海實業控股的每股收益實際上每年提高了0.5%。因此,EPS似乎不是理解市場如何評估股票的良好指南。或者過去的增長預期可能是不合理的。

By glancing at these numbers, we'd posit that the the market had expectations of much higher growth, five years ago. Having said that, we might get a better idea of what's going on with the stock by looking at other metrics.

我們喜歡內部人員在過去的12個月中購買股票。 話雖如此,大多數人認爲,收益和收入增長趨勢是業務更有意義的指標。 如果您正在考慮購買或出售CVB金融股票,請查看此免費報告,其中顯示了分析師的利潤預測。

The most recent dividend was actually lower than it was in the past, so that may have sent the share price lower.

最近的分紅實際上比過去低,可能導致股價下跌。

You can see how earnings and revenue have changed over time in the image below (click on the chart to see the exact values).

你可以在下面的圖片中看到收入和營業收入隨時間的變化情況(單擊圖表可查看精確值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:363 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 4th 2024
SEHK:3632014年7月4日收益和營收增長

It's probably worth noting that the CEO is paid less than the median at similar sized companies. It's always worth keeping an eye on CEO pay, but a more important question is whether the company will grow earnings throughout the years. So it makes a lot of sense to check out what analysts think Shanghai Industrial Holdings will earn in the future (free profit forecasts).

值得注意的是,該公司CEO的薪酬低於同等規模公司的中位數。關注CEO薪酬總是很重要的,但更重要的問題是公司是否會在未來幾年實現盈利增長。因此,檢查分析師認爲上海實業控股公司未來將獲得的利潤預測非常有意義(免費利潤預測)。

What About Dividends?

那麼分紅怎麼樣呢?

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. We note that for Shanghai Industrial Holdings the TSR over the last 5 years was 12%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.

在考慮投資回報時,重要的是考慮總股東回報(TSR)和股票回報之間的差異。 TSR包括任何剝離或折讓的資本籌集(基於股息被重新投資的假設),以及任何股息。因此,對於支付慷慨的股息公司而言,TSR通常比股票回報高得多。就中國神威藥業集團而言,其TSR在過去5年中達到了75%。這超過了我們之前提到的股票回報。該公司支付的股息已經提高了總股東回報。總股東回報股票回報而股票價格回報僅反映股票價格的變化,TSR還包括股息價值(假設再投資)和任何折扣資本籌集或分拆的利益。可以說,TSR給出了股票所產生收益的更全面的圖片。我們注意到,對於上海實業控股來說,過去5年的TSR爲12%,這比上面提到的股票價格回報更好。公司支付的股息也提高了這一指數。股東回報。

A Different Perspective

不同的觀點

It's nice to see that Shanghai Industrial Holdings shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 18% over the last year. That's including the dividend. Since the one-year TSR is better than the five-year TSR (the latter coming in at 2% per year), it would seem that the stock's performance has improved in recent times. In the best case scenario, this may hint at some real business momentum, implying that now could be a great time to delve deeper. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Shanghai Industrial Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Shanghai Industrial Holdings (1 is a bit concerning) that you should be aware of.

很高興看到上海實業控股股東在過去一年中獲得了18%的總股東回報。這包括股息。由於一年的TSR比五年的TSR更好(後者每年爲2%),因此股票的表現在近期有所提高。在最好的情況下,這可能暗示着真正的業務動力,這意味着現在是深入研究的好時機。跟蹤股票的長期表現總是很有趣的。但要更好地了解上海實業控股,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經確定了2個警告標誌對於上海實業控股(其中1個有點令人擔憂),你應該注意到。

Of course Shanghai Industrial Holdings may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of growth stocks.

當然,上海實業控股肯定不是最好的股票買入選擇,因此您可能希望查看這些成長股的免費收藏品。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Hong Kong exchanges.

請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了當前在香港證券交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論