share_log

Is Greenworks (Jiangsu) (SZSE:301260) Using Debt In A Risky Way?

Is Greenworks (Jiangsu) (SZSE:301260) Using Debt In A Risky Way?

綠達控股(江蘇)(SZSE:301260)是否在冒險使用債務?
Simply Wall St ·  07/04 19:15

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We note that Greenworks (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301260) does have debt on its balance sheet. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

作爲一名投資者,有人認爲波動性代表了最佳的風險考量方式,而禾倫•巴菲特曾經說過:“波動性並非是風險的代名詞。” 我們在分析企業的風險時,自然會關注其資產負債表,因爲債務往往是一家企業出現崩潰的關鍵原因之一。我們注意到,格林威化工(江蘇)股份有限公司(深交所股票代碼:301260)的資產負債表上確實存在債務。但這是否會成爲股東的擔憂呢?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

債務是幫助企業發展的工具,但如果企業無法償還其貸款人的債務,那麼它將完全處於債權人的支配下。在最壞的情況下,如果公司無法償還債務,它甚至可能會破產。然而,在更爲普遍(但仍然代價高昂)的情況下,企業必須以低廉的股價稀釋股東權益,以便控制債務。當然,很多企業使用債務來支持其發展,而不會產生任何負面影響。在考慮債務水平時,我們首先考慮現金和債務水平。

What Is Greenworks (Jiangsu)'s Debt?

格林威化工(江蘇)的債務是多少?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Greenworks (Jiangsu) had CN¥2.08b of debt in March 2024, down from CN¥2.83b, one year before. However, it does have CN¥2.67b in cash offsetting this, leading to net cash of CN¥582.5m.

您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,但可以看出格林威化工(江蘇)在2024年3月負債20.8億人民幣,比1年前的28.3億人民幣有所下降。但它有26.7億人民幣的現金來抵消這些負債,導致淨現金爲5825萬人民幣。

debt-equity-history-analysis
SZSE:301260 Debt to Equity History July 4th 2024
SZSE:301260股票的負債/權益歷史表於2024年7月4日

How Strong Is Greenworks (Jiangsu)'s Balance Sheet?

格林威化工(江蘇)的資產負債表情況如何?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Greenworks (Jiangsu) had liabilities of CN¥2.89b due within a year, and liabilities of CN¥1.38b falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of CN¥2.67b and CN¥2.14b worth of receivables due within a year. So it actually has CN¥543.5m more liquid assets than total liabilities.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,格林威化工(江蘇)在一年內有28.9億人民幣的短期到期債務和13.8億人民幣的長期到期債務。另一方面,它有26.7億人民幣的現金和21.4億人民幣的應收款項。因此,它實際上有5435萬人民幣的淨現金。這種短期流動性表明,格林威化工(江蘇)很可能可以輕鬆償還債務,因爲其資產負債表還遠未達到極限。總的來說,格林威化工(江蘇)擁有淨現金,所以可以說它沒有重負債。在分析債務時,清晰地關注資產負債表是必要的。但最終的業務盈利能力將決定格林威化工(江蘇)是否能長期加強其資產負債表。如果您想知道專業人士的看法,可以閱讀這份有關分析師盈利預測的免費報告。總負債還多出了更多的流動資產。

This short term liquidity is a sign that Greenworks (Jiangsu) could probably pay off its debt with ease, as its balance sheet is far from stretched. Succinctly put, Greenworks (Jiangsu) boasts net cash, so it's fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load! The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Greenworks (Jiangsu) can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

在過去的一年中,格林威化工(江蘇)發生了利息和稅前虧損,並將其營業收入減少了9.6%,僅爲47億元人民幣。這不是我們希望看到的結果。這意味着僅僅清晰地關注資產負債表是遠遠不夠的,分析債務的最終目的還包括關注業務盈利能力。

In the last year Greenworks (Jiangsu) had a loss before interest and tax, and actually shrunk its revenue by 9.6%, to CN¥4.7b. That's not what we would hope to see.

格林威化工(江蘇)存在多少風險?

So How Risky Is Greenworks (Jiangsu)?

由於長期虧損的公司往往比盈利多年的公司風險更高,因此它們的風險也更大。實事求是地說,在過去的一年裏,格林威化工(江蘇)存在路徑利息稅前損失。在同一時期內,它還出現了負自由現金流流出2620萬元人民幣和4320萬人民幣的賬面虧損。具有挽救性的是該公司賬面上擁有小於其總債務減其淨現金負債的償還能力。儘管其資產負債表似乎足夠流動,但如果公司無法定期產生自由現金流,債務仍會讓我們有所擔憂。在分析債務時,清晰地關注資產負債表是必要的。但並不是所有的投資風險都在資產負債表之內。我們已經找出了格林威化工(江蘇)的1項警告跡象,了解這些警告跡象應該是您投資過程的一部分。

By their very nature companies that are losing money are more risky than those with a long history of profitability. And in the last year Greenworks (Jiangsu) had an earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss, truth be told. And over the same period it saw negative free cash outflow of CN¥262m and booked a CN¥432m accounting loss. But the saving grace is the CN¥582.5m on the balance sheet. That means it could keep spending at its current rate for more than two years. Even though its balance sheet seems sufficiently liquid, debt always makes us a little nervous if a company doesn't produce free cash flow regularly. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. We've identified 1 warning sign with Greenworks (Jiangsu) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

作爲一名投資者,有人認爲波動性代表了最佳的風險考量方式,而禾倫•巴菲特曾經說過:“波動性並非是風險的代名詞。” 我們在分析企業的風險時,自然會關注其資產負債表,因爲債務往往是一家企業出現崩潰的關鍵原因之一。我們注意到,格林威化工(江蘇)股份有限公司(深交所股票代碼:301260)的資產負債表上確實存在債務。但這是否會成爲股東的擔憂呢?債務是幫助企業發展的工具,但如果企業無法償還其貸款人的債務,那麼它將完全處於債權人的支配下。在最壞的情況下,如果公司無法償還債務,它甚至可能會破產。然而,在更爲普遍(但仍然代價高昂)的情況下,企業必須以低廉的股價稀釋股東權益,以便控制債務。當然,很多企業使用債務來支持其發展,而不會產生任何負面影響。在考慮債務水平時,我們首先考慮現金和債務水平。由於長期虧損的公司往往比盈利多年的公司風險更高,因此它們的風險也更大。實事求是地說,在過去的一年裏,格林威化工(江蘇)存在路徑利息稅前損失。在同一時期內,它還出現了負自由現金流流出2620萬元人民幣和4320萬人民幣的賬面虧損。但拯救的是該公司賬面上擁有小於其總債務減其淨現金負債的償還能力,這意味着其符合當前速度進行支出的能力仍然超過兩年。儘管其資產負債表似乎足夠流動,但如果公司無法定期產生自由現金流,債務仍會讓我們有所擔憂。在分析債務時,清晰地關注資產負債表是必要的。但對於投資風險,資產負債表不是唯一的關鍵因素。我們已經找出了格林威化工(江蘇)的1項警告跡象,了解這些警告跡象應該是您投資過程的一部分。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果您在所有這些工作之後,更感興趣於擁有堅實資產負債表的快速發展公司,請立即查看我們的淨現金成長股列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論