share_log

We Think DT Midstream (NYSE:DTM) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt

We Think DT Midstream (NYSE:DTM) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt

我們認爲Dt Midstream(紐交所:DTM)在其債務方面存在一些風險。
Simply Wall St ·  07/05 08:13

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that DT Midstream, Inc. (NYSE:DTM) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

David Iben曾明確表示,“波動性不是我們關心的風險,我們關心的是避免資本的永久損失”。因此,當您考慮任何給定股票的風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會導致公司破產。我們可以看到,DT Midstream, Inc. (NYSE: DTM)在其業務中使用了債務。但更重要的問題是:這些債務造成了多少風險?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

負債在企業遇到麻煩、無法用新的資本或自由現金流償還時會給企業提供幫助。如果公司無法履行償還負債的法律義務,股東可能會一無所有。然而,更常見的(但仍很痛苦)情況是,公司不得不以低價籌集新的股權資本,從而永久稀釋股東的利益。當然,許多公司在沒有負面後果的情況下使用負債來進行增長。在考慮一家公司的負債水平時的第一步是考慮其現金和債務的總體情況。

How Much Debt Does DT Midstream Carry?

DT Midstream的負債有多重?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that DT Midstream had US$3.12b of debt in March 2024, down from US$3.47b, one year before. Net debt is about the same, since the it doesn't have much cash.

您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,其顯示DT Midstream於2024年3月有31.2億美元的債務,下降至3.47億美元,比起一年前略有下降。淨債務大致相同,因爲其沒有太多的現金。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:DTM Debt to Equity History July 5th 2024
NYSE:DTM負債股本比歷史記錄於2024年7月5日

A Look At DT Midstream's Liabilities

關於DT Midstream的負債

The latest balance sheet data shows that DT Midstream had liabilities of US$322.0m due within a year, and liabilities of US$4.32b falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$41.0m in cash and US$150.0m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$4.45b.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,DT Midstream有3.22億美元的負債在一年內到期,之後到期的負債有43.2億美元。相對之下,12個月內到期的現金和應收賬款分別有4100萬美元和1500萬美元。因此,其負債超過了其現金和(短期)應收賬款的總和,超過了445億美元。

This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of US$6.82b. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.

相對於其市值68.2億美元而言,這是一座巨大的槓桿。這表明,如果公司需要迅速補充其資產負債表,股東們將遭受嚴重稀釋。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

通過查看公司的淨債務與利息、稅、折舊、攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)之比以及它的利息費用(利息覆蓋率)可以衡量一個公司的債務負擔與收益能力。因此,我們考慮將債務與有無計算折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對比。

DT Midstream has a debt to EBITDA ratio of 4.6 and its EBIT covered its interest expense 3.2 times. Taken together this implies that, while we wouldn't want to see debt levels rise, we think it can handle its current leverage. The good news is that DT Midstream improved its EBIT by 4.3% over the last twelve months, thus gradually reducing its debt levels relative to its earnings. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if DT Midstream can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

DT Midstream的債務/EBITDA比率爲4.6,其EBIT覆蓋利息支出的次數爲3.2次。總的來說,這表明儘管我們不希望看到債務水平上升,但我們認爲該公司可以處理其當前的槓桿。好消息是,DT Midstream在過去十二個月中提高了其EBIT 4.3%,逐步將其債務水平與其收入相對比降低。分析債務水平時,資產負債表是開始研究的明顯位置。但最終,企業未來的盈利能力將決定DT Midstream是否能夠隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您想了解專業人士的意見,則可能會發現此免費報告——分析師盈利預測——很有趣。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, DT Midstream recorded free cash flow worth 61% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

最後,雖然稅務人員可能會喜歡會計利潤,但貸款人只接受冰冷的現金。因此,我們始終檢查有多少EBIT轉化爲自由現金流。在最近的三年中,DT Midstream錄得的自由現金流價值爲其EBIT的61%,這個值在免除利息和稅金的情況下是正常的。這筆冰冷的現金意味着在需要的時候可以減輕債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

Both DT Midstream's net debt to EBITDA and its interest cover were discouraging. But its not so bad at converting EBIT to free cash flow. We think that DT Midstream's debt does make it a bit risky, after considering the aforementioned data points together. That's not necessarily a bad thing, since leverage can boost returns on equity, but it is something to be aware of. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with DT Midstream .

DT Midstream的淨債務/EBITDA和利息保障倍數讓人望而卻步。但是將其EBIT換算爲自由現金流的能力並不差。考慮到上述數據點後,我們認爲DT Midstream的債務確實使其有些風險。這並不一定是件壞事,因爲槓桿可以提高股本收益,但這是需要注意的事情。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中了解債務的信息最豐富。但最終,每家公司都可能有存在於資產負債表以外的風險。因此,您應該注意我們在DT Midstream中發現的2個警告信號。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

說到底,有時更容易關注那些甚至不需要債務的公司。讀者可以免費查看零淨債務增長股票列表,立即獲得。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論