share_log

Upwork (NASDAQ:UPWK) Adds US$58m to Market Cap in the Past 7 Days, Though Investors From Three Years Ago Are Still Down 80%

Upwork (NASDAQ:UPWK) Adds US$58m to Market Cap in the Past 7 Days, Though Investors From Three Years Ago Are Still Down 80%

upwork(納斯達克:UPWK)在過去7天內增加了5800萬美元的市值,儘管三年前的投資者仍然虧損了80%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/05 08:01

It's not possible to invest over long periods without making some bad investments. But really big losses can really drag down an overall portfolio. So take a moment to sympathize with the long term shareholders of Upwork Inc. (NASDAQ:UPWK), who have seen the share price tank a massive 80% over a three year period. That'd be enough to cause even the strongest minds some disquiet. We really hope anyone holding through that price crash has a diversified portfolio. Even when you lose money, you don't have to lose the lesson.

長期投資難免會有一些投資失敗的情況。但如果損失過大,將會大大拖累整個投資組合的表現。因此,請對Upwork Inc. (納斯達克: UPWK)的長期股東表示同情,他們在三年期間看到股價大幅下跌了80%。即使是最強大的心靈,也足以讓他們感到不安。我們真誠地希望任何在價格崩盤中持有股票的人都有一個多樣化的投資組合。即使你虧錢了,也不要把教訓也一起虧掉了。

The recent uptick of 4.2% could be a positive sign of things to come, so let's take a look at historical fundamentals.

最近上漲4.2%可能是好事的積極信號,因此讓我們來看看歷史基本面。

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.

在他的文章《格雷厄姆和多德斯維爾超級投資者》中,禾倫·巴菲特描述了股票價格並不總是反映公司價值的合理方式。考慮市場對公司的看法如何發生變化的一個不完美但簡單的方法是將每股收益(EPS)的變化與股價的變動進行比較。股票價格並不總是反映公司價值的合理方式在股價上漲的5年中,新加坡交易所由虧損逐漸轉爲盈利。而在之後的12個月內,該公司的財務報表則呈虧損狀態,這表明它的盈利能力不可靠。其他指標可能會更好地反映公司的價值變化。

Upwork became profitable within the last five years. That would generally be considered a positive, so we are surprised to see the share price is down. So it's worth looking at other metrics to try to understand the share price move.

Upwork在過去五年內實現了盈利。一般來說,這會被認爲是一個積極因素,所以我們對股價下跌感到驚訝。因此,值得關注其他指標,以嘗試了解股價的走勢。

We note that, in three years, revenue has actually grown at a 18% annual rate, so that doesn't seem to be a reason to sell shares. It's probably worth investigating Upwork further; while we may be missing something on this analysis, there might also be an opportunity.

我們注意到,在三年的時間裏,營業收入實際上以每年18%的速度增長,因此這似乎不是賣出股票的原因。可能值得進一步調查Upwork;雖然我們在這項分析上可能錯過了什麼,但也可能存在機會。

You can see how earnings and revenue have changed over time in the image below (click on the chart to see the exact values).

你可以在下面的圖片中看到收入和營業收入隨時間的變化情況(單擊圖表可查看精確值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:UPWK Earnings and Revenue Growth July 5th 2024
納斯達克: Upwork 2024年7月5日的收益和營業收入增長

Upwork is a well known stock, with plenty of analyst coverage, suggesting some visibility into future growth. So it makes a lot of sense to check out what analysts think Upwork will earn in the future (free analyst consensus estimates)

Upwork是一個知名的股票,有大量的分析師關注,這表明對未來的增長有一定的可見性。因此,檢查分析師對Upwork未來賺取的收益的看法(免費分析師共識估計)是很有意義的。

A Different Perspective

不同的觀點

Upwork's TSR for the year was broadly in line with the market average, at 28%. To take a positive view, the gain is pleasing, and it sure beats annualized TSR loss of 6%, which was endured over half a decade. While 'turnarounds seldom turn' there are green shoots for Upwork. If you would like to research Upwork in more detail then you might want to take a look at whether insiders have been buying or selling shares in the company.

Upwork今年的TSR與市場平均水平基本持平,爲28%。積極的觀點是,這種收益令人滿意,肯定比在長達半個世紀的年化TSR虧損6%之後要好。雖然"反轉很少反轉",但對於Upwork來說也有發展的機會。如果您想更詳細地研究Upwork,那麼您可能需要查看內部人員是否已經購買或出售該公司的股票。

But note: Upwork may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with past earnings growth (and further growth forecast).

但請注意:Upwork可能不是最好的股票購買選擇。因此,查看過去盈利增長(以及未來增長預測)的有趣公司的免費列表會很有幫助。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文所引述的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所上市的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論