share_log

In Spite of Recent Selling, Insiders Still Control 50% of Dell Technologies Inc. (NYSE:DELL)

In Spite of Recent Selling, Insiders Still Control 50% of Dell Technologies Inc. (NYSE:DELL)

儘管最近有售出,內部人仍控制Dell Technologies Inc.(紐交所:DELL)的50%股份。
Simply Wall St ·  07/07 10:30

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Dell Technologies' growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 59% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 從機構股東比例可以看出,Dell Technologies的內部人士對公司的發展充滿信心,持股比例非常大。
  • 總共有2位投資者持有該公司的多數股份,佔據了59%的所有權。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

A look at the shareholders of Dell Technologies Inc. (NYSE:DELL) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 50% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

通過觀察Dell Technologies股票的持有人可以看出哪個群體最有力量。可以看到,公司個別內部人士所持股份佔有50%以上。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。

Despite selling some shares recently, insiders control a good portion of the company's stock.

儘管近期有內部人士減持了一些股份,但他們仍然控制着公司的很大一部分股票。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Dell Technologies.

在下面的圖表中,我們可以放大觀看Dell Technologies不同持股群體之間的差異。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:DELL Ownership Breakdown July 7th 2024
2024年7月7日的NYSE:DELL所有權結構如下

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Dell Technologies?

機構所有權對戴爾科技意味着什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Dell Technologies. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Dell Technologies' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者持有了很大一部分Dell Technologies的股份,這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師們已經研究了這支股票,而且他們很喜歡這隻股票。但就像所有人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。當多個機構都持有股票時,總會存在一個“擁擠的持股”。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。你可以看到Dell Technologies歷史上的收益和營業收入,但要記住故事總有更多的版本。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:DELL Earnings and Revenue Growth July 7th 2024
2024年7月7日NY:DELL的收益和營業收入增長如下

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Dell Technologies. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Michael Dell with 49% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.8% and 2.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

對於Dell Technologies的股權結構進行了分析,其中最大的股東是首席執行官邁克爾·戴爾,持有公司已發行股份的49%;而第二大和第三大股東分別持有公司已發行股份的9.8%和2.3%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前兩個股東共同控制了公司50%以上的股份,說明他們有相當大的影響力來影響公司的決策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Dell Technologies

戴爾科技的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Dell Technologies Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$99b, and insiders have US$49b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

內部人士持有Dell Technologies Inc.的相當大部分股份,在其市值僅有990億美元的公司中,內部人士名下持股達490億美元,這相當顯著。大多數人會認爲,尤其是在這樣一個規模的公司,這顯示了與股東的很好的一致性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人員是否有買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 12% stake in Dell Technologies. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通投資者,通常是個體投資者,持有Dell Technologies 12%的股份,雖然這種所有權的大小可能不足以影響他們的政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 9.8% stake in Dell Technologies. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有Dell Technologies 9.8%的股份,這表明他們可能在重要的政策決策上具有影響力。有時我們看到私募股權公司在長期內保留公司股份,但通常情況下,他們具有更短的投資週期,並且 -- 正如其名稱所示 -- 不會大量投資於上市公司。經過一定時間,他們可能會尋求出售,在別處重新投資。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Dell Technologies that you should be aware of before investing here.

儘管了解所有擁有公司的不同群體是值得考慮的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們在這裏發現了Dell Technologies的3個警示信號,你在進行投資之前應該了解這些警示信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論