share_log

Investors Could Be Concerned With Darden Restaurants' (NYSE:DRI) Returns On Capital

Investors Could Be Concerned With Darden Restaurants' (NYSE:DRI) Returns On Capital

投資者可能關注達登飯店(紐交所:DRI)的資本回報率
Simply Wall St ·  07/11 14:23

If we want to find a potential multi-bagger, often there are underlying trends that can provide clues. Amongst other things, we'll want to see two things; firstly, a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an expansion in the company's amount of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. Having said that, from a first glance at Darden Restaurants (NYSE:DRI) we aren't jumping out of our chairs at how returns are trending, but let's have a deeper look.

如果我們想找到潛在的多袋裝貨商,通常有潛在的趨勢可以提供線索。除其他外,我們希望看到兩件事:首先,動用資本回報率(ROCE)的增長,其次,公司的資本使用量擴大。如果你看到這一點,這通常意味着它是一家擁有良好商業模式和大量盈利再投資機會的公司。話雖如此,乍一看 Darden Restaurants(紐約證券交易所代碼:DRI),我們並不是對回報趨勢不屑一顧,但讓我們更深入地了解一下。

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?

資本使用回報率(ROCE):這是什麼?

If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Darden Restaurants:

如果你以前沒有與ROCE合作過,它會衡量公司從其業務中使用的資本中產生的 “回報”(稅前利潤)。分析師使用這個公式來計算 Darden Restaurants 的價格:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

已動用資本回報率 = 息稅前收益 (EBIT) ¥(總資產-流動負債)

0.15 = US$1.3b ÷ (US$11b - US$2.2b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to May 2024).

0.15 = 13億美元 ÷(110億美元至22億美元)(基於截至2024年5月的過去十二個月)。

Thus, Darden Restaurants has an ROCE of 15%. On its own, that's a standard return, however it's much better than the 11% generated by the Hospitality industry.

因此,達登餐廳的投資回報率爲15%。就其本身而言,這是標準回報,但要比酒店業產生的11%好得多。

big
NYSE:DRI Return on Capital Employed July 11th 2024
紐約證券交易所:DRI 2024年7月11日動用資本回報率

In the above chart we have measured Darden Restaurants' prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for Darden Restaurants .

在上圖中,我們將Darden Restaurants之前的投資回報率與之前的表現進行了比較,但可以說,未來更爲重要。如果你想了解分析師對未來的預測,你應該查看我們的免費Darden Restaurants分析師報告。

What Can We Tell From Darden Restaurants' ROCE Trend?

我們可以從 Darden Restaurants 的 ROCE 趨勢中得出什麼?

In terms of Darden Restaurants' historical ROCE movements, the trend isn't fantastic. Over the last five years, returns on capital have decreased to 15% from 19% five years ago. Meanwhile, the business is utilizing more capital but this hasn't moved the needle much in terms of sales in the past 12 months, so this could reflect longer term investments. It's worth keeping an eye on the company's earnings from here on to see if these investments do end up contributing to the bottom line.

就達登餐廳的歷史ROCE走勢而言,這種趨勢並不理想。在過去五年中,資本回報率從五年前的19%下降到15%。同時,該業務正在使用更多的資本,但在過去的12個月中,這並沒有對銷售產生太大影響,因此這可能反映出長期投資。從現在起,值得關注公司的收益,看看這些投資最終是否確實爲利潤做出了貢獻。

The Bottom Line On Darden Restaurants' ROCE

Darden Restaurants ROCE 的底線

To conclude, we've found that Darden Restaurants is reinvesting in the business, but returns have been falling. And investors may be recognizing these trends since the stock has only returned a total of 30% to shareholders over the last five years. So if you're looking for a multi-bagger, the underlying trends indicate you may have better chances elsewhere.

總而言之,我們發現達登餐廳正在對該業務進行再投資,但回報率一直在下降。投資者可能會意識到這些趨勢,因爲在過去五年中,該股總共只給股東帶來了30%的回報。因此,如果你正在尋找一款多袋裝車,潛在的趨勢表明你在其他地方的機會可能更大。

One more thing, we've spotted 2 warning signs facing Darden Restaurants that you might find interesting.

還有一件事,我們在達登餐廳面前發現了兩個警告標誌,你可能會覺得有趣。

While Darden Restaurants isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.

儘管Darden Restaurants的回報率並不高,但請查看這份免費清單,列出了資產負債表穩健的股本回報率高的公司。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論