share_log

Here's Why Danaher (NYSE:DHR) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly

Here's Why Danaher (NYSE:DHR) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly

爲什麼丹納赫(紐交所:DHR)能夠負責地管理其債務
Simply Wall St ·  07/12 09:00

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. As with many other companies Danaher Corporation (NYSE:DHR) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

禾倫巴菲特曾經說過,“波動性遠非風險代名詞”。因此我們認爲,債務——通常和破產有關——是評估公司風險時非常重要的因素。同許多其他公司一樣,丹納赫公司(紐交所:DHR)也利用債務。但真正的問題是,是否這些債務會使該公司變得更加冒險。

When Is Debt A Problem?

什麼時候負債才是一個問題?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

債務是幫助企業成長的工具,但如果企業無力償還債務,則意味着企業處於債權人的掌控之下。最糟糕的情況是,如果企業無法償還債務,則可能會破產。然而,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是公司必須以低廉的股價稀釋股東的權益,才能控制債務。但是,通過債務替代權益稀釋,債務可以成爲那些需要資本以高回報率進行投資的企業的極好工具。在評估債務水平時,我們首先考慮現金和債務水平的結合。

What Is Danaher's Debt?

丹納赫的債務情況?

As you can see below, Danaher had US$18.2b of debt at March 2024, down from US$19.8b a year prior. On the flip side, it has US$7.03b in cash leading to net debt of about US$11.1b.

如下圖所示,截至2024年3月,丹納赫的債務總額爲182億美元,較上年的198億美元有下降。反觀其現金流,其有70.3億美元的現金,因此淨債務約爲111億美元。

big
NYSE:DHR Debt to Equity History July 12th 2024
紐交所:DHR的債務-股本歷史變化

A Look At Danaher's Liabilities

看一下丹納赫的負債情況?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Danaher had liabilities of US$7.78b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$22.2b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$7.03b and US$3.38b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$19.5b.

從最新的資產負債表數據來看,我們可以發現丹納赫的1年內到期負債金額爲77.8億美元,超過1年到期的負債總額爲222億美元。另一方面,其有70.3億美元的現金以及33.8億美元的1年內到期應收票據。因此,其負債總額超過了其現金流和(短期)應收賬款的總和,達到了195億美元。

Of course, Danaher has a titanic market capitalization of US$179.4b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.

當然,丹納赫具有1794億美元的巨額市值,因此這些負債可能是可管理的。但依舊有足夠的負債數額,我們一定會建議股東們繼續關注公司的資產負債表狀況。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

通過查看公司的淨債務與利息、稅、折舊、攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)之比以及它的利息費用(利息覆蓋率)可以衡量一個公司的債務負擔與收益能力。因此,我們考慮將債務與有無計算折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對比。

Danaher's net debt to EBITDA ratio of about 1.5 suggests only moderate use of debt. And its commanding EBIT of 1k times its interest expense, implies the debt load is as light as a peacock feather. In fact Danaher's saving grace is its low debt levels, because its EBIT has tanked 25% in the last twelve months. When a company sees its earnings tank, it can sometimes find its relationships with its lenders turn sour. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Danaher can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

丹納赫的淨債務/息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)比率約爲1.5,表明公司在債務方面的使用只屬於中等程度。其0.1萬倍於利息費用的EBIT顯著,表明債務負載輕如孔雀羽毛。實際上,丹納赫保存了低水平的債務,因爲其EBIT在過去12個月中下跌了25%。當公司看到其盈利下滑時,有時會發現其與貸款人的關係變得糟糕。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但最終商業的未來盈利能力將決定丹納赫是否能隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您想了解專業人士的想法,您可能會發現下面這篇關於分析師盈利預測的免費報告很有趣。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last three years, Danaher recorded free cash flow worth a fulsome 98% of its EBIT, which is stronger than we'd usually expect. That positions it well to pay down debt if desirable to do so.

但我們的考慮也非常重要,因爲公司無法用紙面盈利支付債務;它需要強有力的現金流。因此我們總是會檢查公司利潤貢獻轉化成的自由現金流金額。在過去的三年中,丹納赫記錄了價值98%的EBIT的自由現金流,這比我們通常預計的要強。這使其有能力在需要時償還債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

The good news is that Danaher's demonstrated ability to cover its interest expense with its EBIT delights us like a fluffy puppy does a toddler. But we must concede we find its EBIT growth rate has the opposite effect. All these things considered, it appears that Danaher can comfortably handle its current debt levels. On the plus side, this leverage can boost shareholder returns, but the potential downside is more risk of loss, so it's worth monitoring the balance sheet. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. We've identified 1 warning sign with Danaher , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

好消息是,丹納赫已經證明其能夠用EBIT覆蓋其利息支出,這讓我們感到像毛絨絨的小狗一樣高興。但是我們必須承認,我們發現其EBIT增長率具有相反的效應。考慮到所有這些因素,丹納赫似乎可以輕鬆處理其當前的債務水平。好處是,這種槓桿可以提高股東回報,但潛在的下降風險也更高,因此值得關注公司的資產負債表。資產負債表很明顯是分析債務的一個關鍵區域。但最終,每個公司都可能存在超出資產負債表範圍的風險。我們已經發現了與丹納赫相關的警告信號,而了解它們應該是您的投資過程的一部分。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果您在所有這些工作之後,更感興趣於擁有堅實資產負債表的快速發展公司,請立即查看我們的淨現金成長股列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關注內容?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋? 對內容感到擔憂? 請直接與我們聯繫。 或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論