share_log

Those Who Invested in Mattel (NASDAQ:MAT) Five Years Ago Are up 41%

Those Who Invested in Mattel (NASDAQ:MAT) Five Years Ago Are up 41%

那些五年前投資美泰(納斯達克股票代碼:MAT)的人現在已經獲得了41%的回報。
Simply Wall St ·  07/12 13:52

When you buy and hold a stock for the long term, you definitely want it to provide a positive return. Furthermore, you'd generally like to see the share price rise faster than the market. Unfortunately for shareholders, while the Mattel, Inc. (NASDAQ:MAT) share price is up 41% in the last five years, that's less than the market return. The last year has been disappointing, with the stock price down 23% in that time.

當您長期購買並持有股票時,肯定希望它提供積極的回報。此外,您通常希望看到股價上漲的速度比市場快。不幸的是對於股東而言,雖然美泰股份有限公司(納斯達克證券交易所:MAT)股價在過去五年中上漲了41%,但其股價上漲的速度低於市場回報率。過去一年表現不佳,股價下跌了23%。

So let's assess the underlying fundamentals over the last 5 years and see if they've moved in lock-step with shareholder returns.

因此,讓我們評估過去5年的基本面,看看它們是否和股東的回報率相符。

To paraphrase Benjamin Graham: Over the short term the market is a voting machine, but over the long term it's a weighing machine. One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company's share price and its earnings per share (EPS).

用本傑明·格雷厄姆的話來說:“短期市場是一臺投票機,但長期市場是一臺稱重機”。檢查市場情緒如何隨時間推移變化的一種方式是查看公司股價和每股收益(EPS)之間的相互作用。

During the five years of share price growth, Mattel moved from a loss to profitability. That's generally thought to be a genuine positive, so investors may expect to see an increasing share price. Given that the company made a profit three years ago, but not five years ago, it is worth looking at the share price returns over the last three years, too. In fact, the Mattel stock price is 14% lower in the last three years. During the same period, EPS grew by 11% each year. It would appear there's a real mismatch between the increasing EPS and the share price, which has declined -5% a year for three years.

在股價上漲的五年期間,美泰從虧損轉爲盈利。這通常被認爲是真正的積極因素,因此投資者可以預期看到股價上漲。考慮到該公司三年前曾經盈利過,但五年前沒有,因此值得看看過去三年的股價回報率。事實上,過去三年美泰股價下跌了14%。在同一時期,EPS每年增長11%。看起來EPS增長,而股價下跌5%/年已經持續了三年,存在着一個實際的不匹配。

You can see how EPS has changed over time in the image below (click on the chart to see the exact values).

您可以在下面的圖片中查看每股收益如何隨時間變化(單擊圖表以查看確切的價值)。

big
NasdaqGS:MAT Earnings Per Share Growth July 12th 2024
納斯達克證券交易所:MAT每股收益增長2024年7月12日。

We know that Mattel has improved its bottom line lately, but is it going to grow revenue? You could check out this free report showing analyst revenue forecasts.

我們知道美泰近期改善了其底部線,但它是否會增長營業收入?您可以查看此免費報告,以查看分析師對營收的預測。

A Different Perspective

不同的觀點

Investors in Mattel had a tough year, with a total loss of 23%, against a market gain of about 24%. However, keep in mind that even the best stocks will sometimes underperform the market over a twelve month period. Longer term investors wouldn't be so upset, since they would have made 7%, each year, over five years. It could be that the recent sell-off is an opportunity, so it may be worth checking the fundamental data for signs of a long term growth trend. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Mattel you should be aware of.

美泰股票投資者今年表現糟糕,收益率虧損了23%,而市場收益率則達到了約24%。但是,請記住,即使是最好的股票有時也會在12個月的時間內表現不佳。長期投資者不會感到太沮喪,因爲他們每年可以獲得7%的收益率,這也意味着在5年內獲得了豐厚的回報。近期的股票拋售可能是一個機會,因此值得檢查基本數據以尋找長期增長趨勢的跡象。我發現長期股價作爲業務表現的替代指標非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如:我們發現 美泰 股票的2個警告信號,您應該注意。

Of course Mattel may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of growth stocks.

當然,美泰可能不是最好的股票買入選擇。因此,您可能希望查看這些增長股票的免費收藏。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文所引述的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所上市的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論