share_log

AES (NYSE:AES) Use Of Debt Could Be Considered Risky

AES (NYSE:AES) Use Of Debt Could Be Considered Risky

AES(紐交所:AES)的債務使用可能被視爲風險
Simply Wall St ·  07/12 14:01

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies The AES Corporation (NYSE:AES) makes use of debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:“把波動性和風險等同起來是完全錯誤的。”當我們考慮一個公司有多大的風險時,我們通常喜歡看它的債務使用情況,因爲過度債務可能導致破產。與其他許多公司一樣,AES公司(紐交所:AES)利用了債務。但更重要的問題是:這些債務製造了多少風險?

When Is Debt A Problem?

什麼時候負債才是一個問題?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

債務可以幫助企業,直到企業無法償還債務,無論是通過新資本還是自由現金流。資本主義的一個重要過程是“創造性破壞”,銀行家無情地清算失敗的企業。然而,更常見(但仍然痛苦)的情況是,企業必須以低價募集新的股權資本,從而永久性地稀釋股東權益。當然,債務的好處在於它通常代表着廉價的資本,特別是當它替換高回報率再投資的稀釋時。考慮一家企業使用多少債務時,首先要做的是看看它的現金和債務。

What Is AES's Net Debt?

AES的淨債務是多少?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at March 2024 AES had debt of US$30.5b, up from US$24.8b in one year. On the flip side, it has US$2.39b in cash leading to net debt of about US$28.1b.

下面的圖像,你可以點擊以獲取更多的細節,顯示在2024年3月,AES的債務從248億美元增加到305億美元。相反的,它有23.9億美元的現金,導致淨債務約爲281億美元。

big
NYSE:AES Debt to Equity History July 12th 2024
紐交所:AES的債務/股本歷史

How Healthy Is AES' Balance Sheet?

AES的資產負債表如何?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that AES had liabilities of US$9.21b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$30.1b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$2.39b in cash and US$1.62b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$35.3b.

我們可以從最近的資產負債表中看到,截至到12個月內,AES有921億美元的負債到期,而302億美元的負債則是超過一年的。相對應的,它有23.9億美元的現金和16.2億美元的應收賬款將於12個月內到期。因此,它的負債總和超過了其現金和(短期)應收賬款約353億美元。

The deficiency here weighs heavily on the US$12.7b company itself, as if a child were struggling under the weight of an enormous back-pack full of books, his sports gear, and a trumpet. So we definitely think shareholders need to watch this one closely. At the end of the day, AES would probably need a major re-capitalization if its creditors were to demand repayment.

這裏的虧損對於這家總值127億美元的公司來說是個重擊,就像一個孩子扛着一個沉重的揹包,裏面裝滿了書,體育裝備和小號一樣。因此,我們認爲股東們一定要密切關注這一點。歸根結底,如果債權人要求償還債務,AES可能需要進行資本重組。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

爲了評估公司的債務與收益的關係,我們計算淨債務除以息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),以及利息費用除以息稅前利潤(EBIT)(其利息覆蓋率)。這種方法的優點是我們同時考慮到債務的絕對量(以淨債務/EBITDA計算),以及與債務相關的實際利息費用(以利息覆蓋率計算)。

AES has a rather high debt to EBITDA ratio of 8.2 which suggests a meaningful debt load. However, its interest coverage of 2.8 is reasonably strong, which is a good sign. More concerning, AES saw its EBIT drop by 6.9% in the last twelve months. If it keeps going like that paying off its debt will be like running on a treadmill -- a lot of effort for not much advancement. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if AES can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

AES的債務/息稅前利潤、折舊和攤銷(EBITDA)比率爲8.2,這表明它有着相當大的負債負擔。然而,其利息覆蓋率爲2.8,這是一個良好的信號。更令人擔憂的是,AES在過去的十二個月中EBIt下降了6.9%。如果像這樣繼續下去,償還債務就像在跑步機上奔跑一樣——很大的努力但卻沒有太多的進展。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中了解到了債務的大多數信息。然而,最終業務的未來盈利能力將決定AES能否隨着時間推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您關注未來,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師的盈利預測。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, AES burned a lot of cash. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.

最後,公司只能通過冷硬現金而不是會計利潤償還債務。因此,我們明顯需要看看EBIt是否會帶來相應的自由現金流。在過去的三年中,AES燒掉了很多現金。雖然這可能是由於擴張支出而導致的,但它確實使債務的風險更大了。

Our View

我們的觀點

To be frank both AES's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow and its track record of staying on top of its total liabilities make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. And furthermore, its interest cover also fails to instill confidence. We think the chances that AES has too much debt a very significant. To our minds, that means the stock is rather high risk, and probably one to avoid; but to each their own (investing) style. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for AES (of which 1 doesn't sit too well with us!) you should know about.

坦白說,AES的EBIt轉換成自由現金流以及其運營總負債的歷史記錄使我們對其債務水平感到相當不安。此外,它的利息覆蓋率也沒有增強信心。我們認爲,AES過度債務的風險非常大。在我們看來,這意味着本公司股票的風險相當高,可能是一個需要避免的公司。當然,關注債務時資產負債表顯然是需要關注的領域,但並不是所有的投資風險都在資產負債表之內——遠非如此,這些風險可能很難發現。每家企業都有這些風險,我們已經發現了AES的4個警告信號(其中1個令我們感到不太舒適!),您也需要知道。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

總的來說,專注於沒有淨債務的公司往往更好。您可以訪問我們的特別列表,其中包含這些公司(所有這些公司都有盈利增長的記錄)。這是免費的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論