share_log

Individual Investors Among Shenzhen Envicool Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002837) Largest Shareholders, Saw Gain in Holdings Value After Stock Jumped 21% Last Week

Individual Investors Among Shenzhen Envicool Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002837) Largest Shareholders, Saw Gain in Holdings Value After Stock Jumped 21% Last Week

股價上漲21%後,深圳英維克科技股份有限公司(SZSE:002837)的個人投資者成爲最大的股東之一,持股價值增長。
Simply Wall St ·  07/12 21:27

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Shenzhen Envicool Technology's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
  • Insiders own 20% of Shenzhen Envicool Technology
  • 深圳英維克科技的重要個人投資者持有情況表明,關鍵決策受到來自更大公衆股東的影響。
  • 前11名股東持有公司50%的股份。
  • 內部股東擁有深圳英維克科技20%的股份。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Shenzhen Envicool Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002837), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 31% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解深圳英維克科技的實際控制權在誰手中,了解業務的所有權結構是很重要的。我們可以看到,個人投資者擁有公司31%的所有權。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, individual investors were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 21% gain.

因此,個人投資者是上週21%的最大受益者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shenzhen Envicool Technology, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究深圳英維克科技的每一種所有者類型,從下圖開始。

big
SZSE:002837 Ownership Breakdown July 13th 2024
SZSE:002837所有權分解2024年7月13日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen Envicool Technology?

機構持股告訴我們關於深圳英維克科技的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shenzhen Envicool Technology. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shenzhen Envicool Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在深圳英維克科技中擁有相當的份額。這表明專業投資者之間的一些信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出錯誤的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查深圳英維克科技過去的收益軌跡(如下)。當然,要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
SZSE:002837 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 13th 2024
SZSE:002837收入和利潤增長2024年7月13日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Shenzhen Envicool Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Shenzhen Yingweike Investment Co., Ltd. with 25% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.7% and 3.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Yong Qi, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

我們注意到,對於深圳英維克科技來說,對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。從我們的數據來看,最大股東是深圳英維克投資有限公司,持有該公司25%的股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有5.7%和3.9%的流通股。第二大股東永琦還擔任首席執行官。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

在深入挖掘後,我們發現前11名股東在該公司擁有50%的股份,這意味着沒有單一的股東對公司擁有顯著的控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen Envicool Technology

深圳英維克科技的內部股權所有情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然“內部人士”的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Shenzhen Envicool Technology Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥18b, and insiders have CN¥3.6b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人員在深圳英維克科技有着相當的持股。它的市值僅爲180億元,內部人員名下持有價值36億元的股票。這相當重要。大多數人都會說,這表明了與股東的良好一致性,特別是在這樣一個規模的公司中。單擊此處以查看這些內部人員是否一直在購買或出售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 31% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Shenzhen Envicool Technology. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有31%的股份,一般公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對深圳英維克科技產生一定影響。雖然這個群體不能掌控一切,但它確實能夠對公司的經營產生真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 27%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們的數據表明,私營公司持有公司27%的股份。僅憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得關注誰擁有這些私營公司。有時內部人員或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司擁有公共公司的股權。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論