Individual Investors Who Own 55% Along With Institutions Invested in Innodata Inc. (NASDAQ:INOD) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week
Individual Investors Who Own 55% Along With Institutions Invested in Innodata Inc. (NASDAQ:INOD) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Innodata by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 42% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Institutional ownership in Innodata is 38%
- 個人投資者對Innodata的重要控制意味着普通公衆在影響公司管理和治理相關決策方面擁有更多的權力。
- 前25大股東持有42%的業務。
- Innodata的機構持股比例爲38%。
A look at the shareholders of Innodata Inc. (NASDAQ:INOD) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 55% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
觀察Innodata股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。我們可以看到,個人投資者擁有公司的大部分股份,擁有55%的所有權。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
While individual investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 13% price gain, institutions also received a 38% cut.
雖然個人投資者是上週股價上漲13%後受益最多的群體,機構也獲得了38%的回報。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Innodata, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究Innodata的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240713/0-db766471da5b13ef110b22bdeb2d3ef6-0-c8bef453cbb778c34dcbfa0ac653c2d9.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Innodata?
機構持股告訴我們有關Innodata的什麼信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Innodata already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Innodata, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Innodata的股份登記簿上已經有機構。實際上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票並且喜歡它。但是就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果兩個大型機構投資者嘗試同時出售股票,很可能會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查Innodata以往的收益軌跡(如下圖)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240713/0-db766471da5b13ef110b22bdeb2d3ef6-1-3f97eb53920dc011be4adb652d369703.png/big)
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Innodata. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 6.3%. With 5.5% and 5.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, Luzich Partners and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. In addition, we found that Jack Abuhoff, the CEO has 4.1% of the shares allocated to their name.
我們注意到,對於Innodata,對沖基金沒有意義的投資。該公司最大的股東是BlackRock,Inc.,擁有6.3%的股份。Luzich Partners和The Vanguard Group,Inc.分別持有股份流通股的5.5%和5.1%,是第二和第三大股東。此外,我們發現CEO Jack Abuhoff名下分配了4.1%的股份。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以了解風向正在往哪裏吹。雖然有一些分析師對該股票進行了覆蓋,但隨着時間的推移,它可能仍然會變得更加知名。
Insider Ownership Of Innodata
Innodata的內部股權情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Innodata Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$34m worth of the US$486m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
股東們可能會有興趣了解內部人在Innodata Inc.持有股權。作爲個人,內部人集體擁有價值3400萬美元的4860萬美元公司的股份。有些人會說,這顯示了股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但是,值得檢查這些內部人是否一直在減持股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 55% of Innodata shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.
由大部分個人投資者組成的普通公衆共同持有Innodata 55%的股份。擁有這麼多的所有權,零售投資者可以共同在影響股東回報的決策方面發揮作用,例如分紅政策和董事任命。他們還可以行使行權投票權,以對利潤率沒有提高的併購或併購投票。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Innodata better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Innodata is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is a bit concerning...
始終值得考慮公司股權的不同群體。但要更好地理解innodata,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,innodata在我們的投資分析中顯示了2個警告信號,其中1個有點令人擔憂...
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。