share_log

Is Nabors Industries (NYSE:NBR) Using Too Much Debt?

Is Nabors Industries (NYSE:NBR) Using Too Much Debt?

納伯斯實業(紐交所:NBR)是否運用了過多的債務?
Simply Wall St ·  07/14 09:46

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We note that Nabors Industries Ltd. (NYSE:NBR) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

作爲一位投資者,有的人認爲波動性而不是債務是考慮風險的最好方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:“波動性遠非風險的代名詞。” 當你考慮一個公司有多大的風險時,考慮到債務通常與業務的崩潰有關,自然需要考慮其資產負債表。我們注意到納伯斯實業有責任負債表上的債務(NYSE:NBR)。但更重要的問題是,這些債務造成了多少風險?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時有危險?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

一般來說,只有在公司無法輕鬆償還債務時,債務才會成爲真正的問題,無論是通過籌集資本還是利用自身的現金流。資本主義的一部分是“創造性毀滅”的過程,即銀行家無情地清算失敗的企業。然而,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,公司必須以便宜的股價稀釋股東,才能控制債務。當然,債務的好處在於,它通常代表便宜的資本,特別是當它代替能夠以高回報率再投資的公司稀釋時。當我們考慮公司使用債務時,首先看的是現金和債務兩者的整體情況。

How Much Debt Does Nabors Industries Carry?

納伯斯實業的負債規模有多大?

As you can see below, Nabors Industries had US$2.51b of debt, at March 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, it also had US$425.6m in cash, and so its net debt is US$2.09b.

正如您在下面看到的,2024年3月,納伯斯實業的債務爲2510萬美元,與去年基本相同。您可以單擊圖表以獲取更多詳細信息。但是,它還有4256萬美元的現金,因此其淨債務爲2.09億美元。

big
NYSE:NBR Debt to Equity History July 14th 2024
NYSE:NBR債務股本比歷史記錄

A Look At Nabors Industries' Liabilities

我們可以從最新的資產負債表中看到,納伯斯實業有6024萬美元的負債到期,期限在一年內,和27.7億美元的到期期間在一年以上的負債。另一方面,它有4256萬美元的現金和4270萬美元的應收賬款到期在一年內。因此,其負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的組合多252億美元。

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Nabors Industries had liabilities of US$602.4m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$2.77b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$425.6m and US$427.0m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$2.52b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

這個缺口讓這家總值7.202億美元的公司籠罩着一種陰影,就像一個巨人立於凡人之上。因此,毫無疑問,我們會密切關注其資產負債表。歸根結底,如果納伯斯實業的債權人要求償還債務,那麼該公司可能需要進行重大的再資本化。

This deficit casts a shadow over the US$720.2m company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. At the end of the day, Nabors Industries would probably need a major re-capitalization if its creditors were to demand repayment.

雖然納伯斯實業的淨債務與息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的倍數爲2.3,但其利息覆蓋倍數似乎弱,爲1.8。在很大程度上,這是因爲它有很多的折舊和攤銷費用。雖然公司經常吹噓這些費用是非現金交易,但大多數這樣的企業仍然需要持續的投資(未計入費用)。無論如何,毫無疑問,該股票正在使用具有重要意義的槓桿。值得注意的是,納伯斯實業的EBIT在過去十二個月中像雨後的竹子一樣飆升,增長了65%。這將使其更容易管理其債務。分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但最重要的是未來的收益,這將決定納伯斯實業今後能否保持健康的資產負債表。因此,如果您想了解專業人士的想法,您可能會發現此免費分析報告對分析師的盈利預測非常有興趣。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

我們通過查看淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比以及計算其利息支出由收益前利息和稅(EBIT)覆蓋的程度來度量一家公司的債務負載相對於其收益能力的程度。此方法的優點在於我們同時考慮了債務的絕對量(以淨債務爲EBITDA)以及與該債務相關的實際利息支出(以其利息覆蓋倍數計算)。

While Nabors Industries has a quite reasonable net debt to EBITDA multiple of 2.3, its interest cover seems weak, at 1.8. In large part that's it has so much depreciation and amortisation. While companies often boast that these charges are non-cash, most such businesses will therefore require ongoing investment (that is not expensed.) Either way there's no doubt the stock is using meaningful leverage. It is well worth noting that Nabors Industries's EBIT shot up like bamboo after rain, gaining 65% in the last twelve months. That'll make it easier to manage its debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Nabors Industries's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

最後,公司只能用冷硬的現金而不是會計利潤償還債務。所以有必要檢查EBIT有多少是由自由現金流支持的。在過去的兩年中,納伯斯實業的自由現金流價值相當於其EBIT的66%,這是正常水平,因爲自由現金流不包括利息和稅。這些冷硬的現金意味着它可以在需要時減少其債務。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Over the most recent two years, Nabors Industries recorded free cash flow worth 66% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

納伯斯實業的總負債和利息覆蓋倍數無疑給它帶來了壓力。但其EBIT增長率告訴我們一個非常不同的故事,並表明它具有一定的韌性。綜合考慮上述因素,我們認爲納伯斯實業的債務對其業務構成一定風險。因此,儘管槓桿增加會提高股本回報率,但我們真的不希望看到它從這裏增加。雖然納伯斯實業在去年沒有創造出法定利潤,但其正面的EBIT意味着盈利能力可能不遠了。如果您想了解其收益是否朝着正確的方向發展,請單擊此處。

Our View

我們的觀點

Nabors Industries's level of total liabilities and interest cover definitely weigh on it, in our esteem. But its EBIT growth rate tells a very different story, and suggests some resilience. Taking the abovementioned factors together we do think Nabors Industries's debt poses some risks to the business. So while that leverage does boost returns on equity, we wouldn't really want to see it increase from here. While Nabors Industries didn't make a statutory profit in the last year, its positive EBIT suggests that profitability might not be far away. Click here to see if its earnings are heading in the right direction, over the medium term.

納伯斯實業的總負債和利息覆蓋倍數無疑給它帶來了壓力。但其EBIT增長率告訴我們一個非常不同的故事,並表明它具有一定的韌性。綜合考慮上述因素,我們認爲納伯斯實業的債務對其業務構成一定風險。因此,儘管槓桿增加會提高股本回報率,但我們真的不希望看到它從這裏增加。雖然納伯斯實業在去年沒有創造出法定利潤,但其正面的EBIT意味着盈利能力可能不遠了。如果您想了解其收益是否朝着正確的方向發展,請單擊此處。

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論