share_log

Institutional Investors Are NBT Bancorp Inc.'s (NASDAQ:NBTB) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$182m Market Cap Gain

Institutional Investors Are NBT Bancorp Inc.'s (NASDAQ:NBTB) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$182m Market Cap Gain

機構投資者是NBt Bancorp Inc.(納斯達克:NBTB)最大的博彩者,並在上週獲得了1.82億美元的市值增長。
Simply Wall St ·  07/14 09:58

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies NBT Bancorp's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 17 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 顯著高的機構持股意味着NBt Bancorp的股票價格對他們的交易行動很敏感。
  • 17名股東持有50%的業務。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

A look at the shareholders of NBT Bancorp Inc. (NASDAQ:NBTB) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 62% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看NBt Bancorp Inc. (納斯達克:NBTB)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有力。我們可以看到,機構掌握公司62%的所有權。換句話說,該群體最有可能從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多利益(或承擔最多損失)

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$2.0b in market cap. One-year return to shareholders is currently 31% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週,當公司的市值達到20億美元時,機構投資者獲益最大。股東的一年回報目前爲31%,上週的收益是錦上添花。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about NBT Bancorp.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對NBt Bancorp告訴我們的內容。

big
NasdaqGS:NBTB Ownership Breakdown July 14th 2024
納斯達克:NBTb所有權拆分情況2024年7月14日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About NBT Bancorp?

機構所有權爲我們提供了哪些關於NBt Bancorp的信息?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

NBT Bancorp already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at NBT Bancorp's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

NBt Bancorp在股權登記簿上已經擁有了機構的認可。他們擁有公司的可觀利益。這表明專業投資者之間存在一些信任。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲有時機構會像其他人一樣進行不良投資。如果多個機構同時改變他們對一支股票的看法,你會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得看看下面的NBt Bancorp的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:NBTB Earnings and Revenue Growth July 14th 2024
納斯達克:NBTb收入和營業收入增長情況2024年7月14日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in NBT Bancorp. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 15% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 12% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.8% by the third-largest shareholder.

機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們可以共同強烈影響董事會的決策。我們注意到,對NBt Bancorp沒有任何有意義的對沖基金投資。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是BlackRock,Inc.,持有15%的流通股。爲了獲得背景信息,第二大股東持有約12%的流通股,第三大股東持有4.8%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 17 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們擁有的所有權數據的更深入研究表明,前17大股東共擁有50%的股權,這意味着沒有任何一個單一股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of NBT Bancorp

NBt Bancorp的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in NBT Bancorp Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$65m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告說公司內部人士擁有NBt Bancorp股票。內部人士持有價值達6500萬美元的股份。這對股東來說是一個真正的積極因素。如果您想探討內部人員對齊的問題,可以單擊此處以查看內部人員是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 34% stake in NBT Bancorp. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

通常是個人投資者的普通公衆持有NBt Bancorp 34%的股份。雖然這個群體不能稱之爲掌控該公司,但它肯定對公司的經營方式產生了真正的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with NBT Bancorp .

我發現查看一家公司的所有者是非常有趣的,但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,你應該注意到我們發現了nbt bancorp的一個風險警示信號。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論