share_log

Stryker (NYSE:SYK) Could Easily Take On More Debt

Stryker (NYSE:SYK) Could Easily Take On More Debt

Stryker(紐交所:SYK)可以輕鬆承擔更多的債務
Simply Wall St ·  07/15 07:18

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that Stryker Corporation (NYSE:SYK) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:“波動性和風險毫無關係。”當我們考慮一家公司的風險時,我們總是喜歡看它的債務使用情況,因爲債務過多會導致破產。我們可以看到,Stryker Corporation(紐交所:SYK)的業務中確實使用了債務。但真正的問題是,這些債務是否使該公司變得有風險。

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時有危險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

債務可以幫助企業,直到企業難以用新的資本或自由現金流償還債務。如果企業無法履行償還債務的法律義務,股東可能拿不到任何東西。然而,更頻繁(但仍然代價高昂)的情況是,公司不得不以極低的價格發行股票,永久地稀釋股東,僅僅爲了支撐其資產負債表。當然,債務的好處在於,它往往代表着便宜的資本,特別是當債務取代具有高回報能力的公司股票時。當我們考慮一家公司的債務使用情況時,我們首先要看現金和債務。

What Is Stryker's Debt?

Stryker的債務狀況如何?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Stryker had US$12.9b in debt in March 2024; about the same as the year before. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$2.41b, its net debt is less, at about US$10.5b.

下面的圖表,您可以單擊以獲取更詳細的信息,顯示Stryker在2024年3月有129億美元的債務,與前一年大致相同。但是,由於它擁有24.1億美元的現金儲備,其淨債務較少,約爲105億美元。

big
NYSE:SYK Debt to Equity History July 15th 2024
紐交所:SYK的股票的債務股本比歷史變化情況如下於2024年7月15日

How Strong Is Stryker's Balance Sheet?

Stryker的資產負債表有多強?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Stryker had liabilities of US$6.96b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$13.3b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had US$2.41b in cash and US$3.47b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$14.4b.

根據最近公佈的資產負債表,Stryker擁有即將在12個月內到期的696億美元的負債,以及超過12個月到期的1,330億美元的負債。與此相抵消的是,它在12個月內擁有24.1億美元的現金和34.7億美元的應收賬款。因此,它的負債比其現金和(近期)應收賬款總和多了144億美元。

Given Stryker has a humongous market capitalization of US$129.3b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.

考慮到Stryker的市值非常高達1293億美元,很難相信這些負債會構成很大的威脅。但是,很明顯,我們應該繼續監控其資產負債表,以防出現惡化。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。

Stryker's net debt to EBITDA ratio of about 1.9 suggests only moderate use of debt. And its commanding EBIT of 17.1 times its interest expense, implies the debt load is as light as a peacock feather. We note that Stryker grew its EBIT by 24% in the last year, and that should make it easier to pay down debt, going forward. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Stryker's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Stryker的淨債務/息稅折舊前利潤(EBITDA)比約爲1.9,表明債務使用只是中度的。其約17.1倍的息稅折舊前利潤(EBIT)表明其債務負擔如同孔雀的羽毛般輕盈。我們注意到,Stryker在過去一年中的EBIT增長了24%,這應該使其更容易還債。資產負債表顯然是分析債務的重點領域。但最終,未在資產負債表之外存在的風險可能存在於任何公司中。請注意,Stryker在我們的投資分析中顯示了2個警示信號,您應該知道......

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. During the last three years, Stryker produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 65% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

但是,我們的最後考慮也很重要,因爲公司無法用紙面利潤償還債務;它需要冰冷的現金。因此,檢查那些可能使EBIT產生自由現金流的發展是值得的。在過去三年中,Stryker產生了強勁的自由現金流,相當於其EBIT的65%,與我們的預期相當。這種實實在在的現金意味着它可以在希望時減輕債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

The good news is that Stryker's demonstrated ability to cover its interest expense with its EBIT delights us like a fluffy puppy does a toddler. And that's just the beginning of the good news since its EBIT growth rate is also very heartening. We would also note that Medical Equipment industry companies like Stryker commonly do use debt without problems. Zooming out, Stryker seems to use debt quite reasonably; and that gets the nod from us. After all, sensible leverage can boost returns on equity. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that Stryker is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

好消息是,Stryker公司展示了用其EBIt支付利息的能力,就像小孩子擁抱毛茸茸的小狗一樣讓我們高興。而且,這只是好消息的開始,因爲它的EBIt增長率也非常令人欣慰。我們還應該注意到,像Stryker這樣的醫療設備行業公司通常可以毫無問題地使用債務。從更宏觀的角度來看,Stryker的債務使用非常合理;這得到了我們的認可。畢竟,合理的槓桿可以提高股本回報率。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中了解了大多數有關債務的信息。但最終,每家公司都可能存在資產負債表之外的風險。請注意,我們的投資分析中Stryker顯示出了2個警示信號,您應該了解一下......

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果您在所有這些工作之後,更感興趣於擁有堅實資產負債表的快速發展公司,請立即查看我們的淨現金成長股列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論