share_log

Lumen Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:LUMN) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 31% Loss Over the Past Year

Lumen Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:LUMN) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 31% Loss Over the Past Year

Lumen Technologies公司 (紐交所:LUMN) 的機構投資者可能會因爲過去一年的31%損失後的近期收益感到滿意。
Simply Wall St ·  07/15 08:20

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Lumen Technologies' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 14 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 鑑於機構投資者在股票中佔據了大部分股份,Lumen Technologies的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
  • 前14大股東擁有該公司的51%。
  • 內部人員最近一直在買入。

Every investor in Lumen Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:LUMN) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 67% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Lumen Technologies, Inc.(NYSE:LUMN) 的每個投資者都應該了解最強有力的股東群體。機構持有67%的股份,是公司中持股最多的群體。換句話說,該群體從他們對該公司的投資中能獲得(或失去)最多的利益。

Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 11% increase in the share price after a year of 31% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.

機構投資者很可能會欣然看待上週股價上漲11%的情況,因爲經歷了31%的虧損後,回報率可能開始趨向提高。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Lumen Technologies.

在下面的圖表中,我們可以看到Lumen Technologies的不同持有人群。

big
NYSE:LUMN Ownership Breakdown July 15th 2024
NYSE:LUMN 2024年7月15日股權結構拆分

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lumen Technologies?

機構所有權對Lumen Technologies有什麼影響?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lumen Technologies. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Lumen Technologies' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Lumen Technologies中持有相當多的股份。這表明專業投資者當中有一定的信譽度。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出錯誤的投資決策,就像其他人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變他們對一隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得看一下Lumen Technologies下面的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:LUMN Earnings and Revenue Growth July 15th 2024
NYSE:LUMN 2024年7月15日盈利和營業收入增長

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Lumen Technologies. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. With 12% and 5.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Kathleen Johnson directly holds 0.9% of the total shares outstanding.

鑑於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,公司董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。我們注意到對於Lumen Technologies來說,對沖基金沒有意義。我們的數據顯示,BlackRock, Inc.是最大的股東,持有15%的流通股。The Vanguard Group, Inc.和State Street Global Advisors, Inc.分別持有流通股的12%和5.2%,分別是第二大和第三大股東。此外,該公司的首席執行官Kathleen Johnson直接持有總流通股的0.9%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 14 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

我們對所有權數據的深入研究表明,最大的14位股東擁有51%的股權,這意味着沒有單個股東佔據多數。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Lumen Technologies

Lumen Technologies的內部股權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Lumen Technologies, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$26m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股東們可能會有興趣了解到,Lumen Technologies, Inc.的內部人員擁有該公司的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意義的相關方向是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約2600萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間有利益相關性。儘管如此,仍可能值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在出售股份。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 31% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公衆 - 包括散戶投資者 - 持有公司31%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然此種持股規模可能不足以在他們的利益中左右決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論