With 88% Ownership in Cummins Inc. (NYSE:CMI), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
With 88% Ownership in Cummins Inc. (NYSE:CMI), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Cummins implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 19 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders have bought recently
- 機構對康明斯的大量持股意味着他們對該公司的股價有重大的影響。
- 總共有19個投資者持有該公司大多數股份,佔有51%的股權。
- 內部人士最近購買了股票。
A look at the shareholders of Cummins Inc. (NYSE:CMI) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 88% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
觀察康明斯股份有限公司股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有力量。持有該公司股份最多的群體,準確來說是約佔88%的機構股東。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$39b in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 15%.
而上週機構投資者在康明斯市值達到390億美元后獲得了最多的利潤。上週的收益進一步提高了股東的年度回報率,目前爲15%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Cummins, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究康明斯的每一種股東類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cummins?
機構所有權對於康明斯有何啓示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Cummins does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Cummins, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們發現康明斯確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股份的一部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。然而,就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售某支股票,股價大跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查一下康明斯的過去盈利軌跡(如下圖)。當然,還有其他需要考慮的因素。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Cummins. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.8% by the third-largest shareholder.
投資者應該注意到,機構實際擁有該公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重大的權力。我們注意到,對康明斯擁有12%流通股的The Vanguard Group,Inc.是最大的股東。作爲背景,第二大股東持有約8.5%的流通股,第三大股東持有5.8%的流通股。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 19 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
進一步了解後,我們發現前19名股東在該公司中擁有51%的股權,這表明沒有單一的股東能對該公司具有重大的控制力。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Cummins
康明斯內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Cummins Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$169m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的數據表明,內部人士以自己的名義擁有的康明斯股份不到1%。作爲一個如此之大的公司,我們不會期望內部人士擁有大量的股票。他們共持有1690萬美元的股份。可以說,最近的買賣同樣值得考慮。你可以點擊此處查看內部人員是否在買賣股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公衆(包括零售投資者)持有該公司12%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略它們。雖然這個群體不能決定一切,但是肯定會對公司的運營產生影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Cummins is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
雖然考慮到擁有某家公司的不同群體非常值得,但有些因素甚至更爲重要。請注意,Cummins在我們的投資分析中顯示出了一個警告信號,您應該了解一下......
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。