share_log

Institutions Profited After Erasca, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ERAS) Market Cap Rose US$169m Last Week but Retail Investors Profited the Most

Institutions Profited After Erasca, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ERAS) Market Cap Rose US$169m Last Week but Retail Investors Profited the Most

上週Erasca, Inc.(納斯達克代碼:ERAS)的市值上漲了1.69億美元,機構獲利最多,但零售投資者獲利最豐厚。
Simply Wall St ·  07/15 09:13

Key Insights

主要見解

  • The considerable ownership by retail investors in Erasca indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 15 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • Erasca受零售投資者的大量持股表明,他們在管理和業務策略方面有更大的發言權。
  • 共有15名投資者擁有該公司的多數股份,擁有50%的所有權。
  • 內部人士最近購買了股票。

A look at the shareholders of Erasca, Inc. (NASDAQ:ERAS) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 39% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看Erasca, Inc.(納斯達克:ERAS)的股東,就可以告訴我們哪個群體最有影響力。持有最大股份的群體是持有39%股份的零售投資者,即如果股價上漲(或者如果出現下滑),該群體將獲得最大的收益。

Following a 26% increase in the stock price last week, retail investors profited the most, but institutions who own 27% stock also stood to gain from the increase.

上週股價上漲26%,零售投資者獲得了最多的利潤,但持有27%股票的機構投資者也獲益最大。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Erasca, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解Erasca的每個所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:ERAS Ownership Breakdown July 15th 2024
納斯達克:ERAS所有權分佈2024年7月15日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Erasca?

機構投資者對Erasca的持股情況告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Erasca. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Erasca's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所見,機構投資者在Erasca擁有相當多的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一些可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出不良投資,就像每個人都會一樣。當多個機構都持有一隻股票時,總會存在一種被“擁擠的交易”波及的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個方面可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在沒有創業歷史的公司中更高。你可以看到Erasca的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更爲複雜。

big
NasdaqGS:ERAS Earnings and Revenue Growth July 15th 2024
納斯達克:ERAS收益和營業收入增長2024年7月15日

It would appear that 5.1% of Erasca shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Jonathan Lim with 12% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Frazier Life Sciences Management, LP and VR Adviser, LLC, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 5.9%.

看起來,Erasca有5.1%的股份受到對沖基金的控制。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可能非常活躍和積極。許多人尋找中期催化劑,使股價上漲。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是首席執行官Jonathan Lim,持有12%的流通股份。第二,第三大股東是Frazier Life Sciences Management, LP和VR Adviser, LLC,他們的股份相等,都爲5.9%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 15 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東名冊上可以看出,50%的所有權由前15名股東控制,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有大多數的所有權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Erasca

Erasca的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Erasca, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$810m, and insiders have US$101m worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人員擁有Erasca, Inc.相當比例的股份。它的市值只有8100萬美元,內部人員自己名下的股份價值10100萬美元。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有很多股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否買賣了股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 39% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,在該公司中擁有39%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然這個群體不能決定一切,但它肯定會對公司的運作產生實際影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 12% stake in Erasca. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有Erasca 12%的股份。這表明他們在關鍵政策決策中可能具有影響力。有時我們看到私募股權公司會長揸,但一般來說它們的投資時間更短,--正如名稱所示--不會過多投資於公共公司。一段時間後,他們可能會尋求出售並重新部署資本。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 4.5% of Erasca stock. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

上市公司目前擁有Erasca股份的4.5%。我們不能確定,但這很可能是一種戰略性的持股。這些企業可能是相似的,或者共同合作。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Erasca better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Erasca is showing 5 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 3 of those are significant...

考慮到擁有一家公司股份的不同群體總是值得思考的,但如果要更好地了解Erasca,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。要知道Erasca在我們的投資分析中顯示了5個預警信號,其中3個非常重要...

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論