share_log

CleanSpark, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CLSK) Top Owners Are Retail Investors With 53% Stake, While 44% Is Held by Institutions

CleanSpark, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CLSK) Top Owners Are Retail Investors With 53% Stake, While 44% Is Held by Institutions

CleanSpark,Inc.(納斯達克:CLSK)的前53%持有者是散戶投資者,機構持有44%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/15 10:30

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • CleanSpark's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 37% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • 44% of CleanSpark is held by Institutions
  • CleanSpark擁有大量散戶投資者的所有權,這表明關鍵決策受到廣大公衆股東的影響
  • 37% 的業務由前 25 名股東持有
  • CleanSpark 44% 的股份由機構持有

Every investor in CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ:CLSK) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 53% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

CleanSpark, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:CLSK)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的群體是擁有53%所有權的散戶投資者。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Meanwhile, institutions make up 44% of the company's shareholders. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies.

同時,機構佔公司股東的44%。機構通常擁有比較成熟的公司的股份,而內部人士擁有相當一部分小型公司的情況並不少見。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about CleanSpark.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於CleanSpark的什麼。

big
NasdaqCM:CLSK Ownership Breakdown July 15th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:CLSK 所有權明細 2024 年 7 月 15 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CleanSpark?

關於CleanSpark,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

CleanSpark already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at CleanSpark's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

CleanSpark已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看CleanSpark的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqCM:CLSK Earnings and Revenue Growth July 15th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:CLSK 收益和收入增長 2024 年 7 月 15 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in CleanSpark. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 6.6% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.5% and 3.1% of the stock. In addition, we found that Zachary Bradford, the CEO has 1.3% of the shares allocated to their name.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對CleanSpark進行有意義的投資。貝萊德公司目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份佔6.6%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約5.5%和3.1%的股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官扎卡里·布拉德福德以其名義分配了1.3%的股份。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

在研究我們的所有權數據時,我們發現25位大股東共同擁有的股份不到50%,這意味着沒有一個人擁有多數股權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of CleanSpark

CleanSpark 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in CleanSpark, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$101m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有CleanSpark, Inc.的部分股份。內部人士持有價值1.01億美元的大量股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。儘管如此,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 53% of CleanSpark shares. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

公衆主要由個人投資者組成,共持有CleanSpark53%的股份。這種所有權規模賦予了公衆投資者一定的集體權力。他們可以而且可能確實會影響有關高管薪酬、股息政策和擬議業務收購的決策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand CleanSpark better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that CleanSpark is showing 4 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 3 of those make us uncomfortable...

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解CleanSpark,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,CleanSpark在我們的投資分析中顯示了4個警告信號,其中3個使我們感到不舒服...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論