share_log

After Losing 23% in the Past Year, Foghorn Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ:FHTX) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

After Losing 23% in the Past Year, Foghorn Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ:FHTX) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

在過去一年中,納斯達克:FHTX的機構股東經歷了23%的損失,最近的增長應讓他們鬆了一口氣。
Simply Wall St ·  07/15 11:52

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Foghorn Therapeutics' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 5 shareholders own 53% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 考慮到機構在股票中的大份額,Foghorn Therapeutics的股價可能會受到其交易決策的影響。
  • 前5大股東擁有公司53%的股份。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

Every investor in Foghorn Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ:FHTX) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 35% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

納斯達克股票代碼FHTX,Foghorn Therapeutics Inc.的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。擁有公司最多股份的群體,確切地說是35%左右,是機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲益最大(或者在經濟下滑時虧損最多)。

Last week's US$65m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 23% losses.

經過一年23%的虧損後,上週該公司市值上漲了6500萬美元,機構投資者可能會對此表示欣賞。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Foghorn Therapeutics.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大展示了Foghorn Therapeutics的不同持股群體。

big
NasdaqGM:FHTX Ownership Breakdown July 15th 2024
納斯達克GM:FHTX所有權分佈2024年7月15日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Foghorn Therapeutics?

機構所有權告訴我們關於Foghorn Therapeutics的許多事情。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Foghorn Therapeutics does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Foghorn Therapeutics' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到Foghorn Therapeutics確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的大部分股份。這表明專業投資者對該公司有一定的信譽。但我們不能單單依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會犯錯誤投資,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構持有一支股票時,存在它們處於一種“擁擠交易”中的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多方可能競相迅速出售股票。這個風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到Foghorn Therapeutics的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住這還有更多的故事。

big
NasdaqGM:FHTX Earnings and Revenue Growth July 15th 2024
納斯達克GM:FHTX盈利和收入增長2024年7月15日

It looks like hedge funds own 5.3% of Foghorn Therapeutics shares. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Our data shows that Flagship Pioneering, Inc is the largest shareholder with 23% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 7.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that Adrian H. Gottschalk, the CEO has 0.9% of the shares allocated to their name.

看起來,對於Foghorn Therapeutics的股份,對沖基金擁有5.3%的股份引起了我的注意,因爲對沖基金有時會試圖影響管理層或促成能夠爲股東創造短期價值的變化。我們的數據顯示,Flagship Pioneering, Inc是持有23%優秀股份的最大股東。同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有優秀股份的11%和7.2%。此外,我們發現首席執行官Adrian H. Gottschalk擁有0.9%的股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前5位股東控制了該公司超過一半的股份,這意味着該組人對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Foghorn Therapeutics

Foghorn Therapeutics的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Foghorn Therapeutics Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$28m worth of the US$341m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以報告內部人員確實擁有Foghorn Therapeutics Inc.的股份。作爲個人,內部人員共持有價值2800萬美元的價值US$34100萬公司的股份。有人會說這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但可能值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在出售股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 21% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公衆-包括散戶投資者-擁有該公司的 21% 的股份,因此不能輕易忽略。儘管該群體不能決定公司的方向,但它確實可以對公司的運營產生實際影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With an ownership of 23%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

擁有23%的私募股權投資公司處於塑造企業策略和價值創造的位置。有些投資者可能會因此受到鼓舞,因爲私募股權投資有時能夠鼓勵讓市場看到公司價值的策略。而這些持有者可能在上市後退出投資。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

We can see that public companies hold 7.2% of the Foghorn Therapeutics shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

我們可以看到上市公司持有Foghorn Therapeutics發行的股份的7.2%。這可能是戰略性的利益,這兩個公司可能有相關的業務利益。也有可能他們已經分離。這個持股可能值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for Foghorn Therapeutics (of which 1 is a bit concerning!) you should know about.

我非常有興趣看看究竟誰擁有一家公司。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如風險。每個公司都有風險,我們已經發現Foghorn Therapeutics有4個警告標誌(其中1個有點令人擔憂!)你應該知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論