Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Newmark Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:NMRK) With 61% Ownership
Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Newmark Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:NMRK) With 61% Ownership
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Newmark Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 11 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 機構對Newmark Group的實質性持股意味着他們對該公司的股價具有重要影響力。
- 前11大股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Newmark Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:NMRK), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 61% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解Newmark Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:NMRK)的真正掌控者是誰,必須了解業務的所有權結構。目前擁有該公司最大股份的是擁有61%所有權的機構,換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$185m in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 63%.
上週該公司市值增加了1.85億美元,對機構投資者來說形勢正在好轉。自持股收益率達到63%。一年多來的收益爲投資者帶來了不小的回報。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Newmark Group, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討Newmark Group的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240716/0-66950e2938d3ee573e6147927bf696dd-0-9e17053fe9c9708e2cbaaaab144611b8.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Newmark Group?
機構持股告訴我們關於Newmark Group的哪些信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
Newmark Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Newmark Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Newmark Group的股份登記薄上已經有機構了,而且他們在公司中擁有相當大的股份。 這意味着爲那些機構工作的分析師已經審視過股票,並且他們看好它。 但就像其他人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。 當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在它們湧入交易的風險。 在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。 您可以查看Newmark Group的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事還有更多內容。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240716/0-66950e2938d3ee573e6147927bf696dd-1-f1c4ca2e6ed853505b8d461bec08e1dc.png/big)
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Newmark Group is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Cf Group Management, Inc. with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 5.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that Barry Gosin, the CEO has 2.4% of the shares allocated to their name.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有超過公司的一半,因此他們可以集體行使重大影響力。 Newmark Group不是由對沖基金擁有。 查看我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是Cf Group Management, Inc.,持有13%的流通股。 同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的12%和5.8%。 此外,我們發現首席執行官Barry Gosin擁有他們名下股份的2.4%。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東登記冊,我們發現其中 50% 的所有權受前11位股東控制,這意味着沒有單一股東掌握所有權益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Newmark Group
Newmark Group的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Newmark Group, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$177m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的最新數據表明,內部人員擁有Newmark Group, Inc.的一些股份。 它是一個相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在的代表意義還是不錯的。 在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約1.77億美元的股份(以當前價格計)。 如果您想探討內幕對齊的問題,可以單擊此處查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
我覺得研究誰真正擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該意識到Lazard存在3個警告信號。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 13%, of the Newmark Group stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
似乎私人企業擁有Newmark Group股票的13%。 深入探究這一點可能很值得,如果相關方,如內部人員,對其中一傢俬人企業有利益,那麼應在年度報告中披露。私人企業也可能對公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Newmark Group better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Newmark Group (including 1 which is a bit concerning) .
想了解公司股份持有者的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解Newmark Group,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該學習 我們發現的3個警示標誌(其中一個令人有些擔憂) 。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。