share_log

Ellington Financial Inc.'s (NYSE:EFC) One-year Returns Climbed After Last Week's 5.5% Gain, Institutional Investors Must Be Happy

Ellington Financial Inc.'s (NYSE:EFC) One-year Returns Climbed After Last Week's 5.5% Gain, Institutional Investors Must Be Happy

上週漲了5.5%之後,Ellington投資公司Inc.(紐交所:EFC)的一年回報率大幅攀升,機構投資者肯定很高興
Simply Wall St ·  07/15 14:02

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Ellington Financial's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 21 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構持股的比例高意味着Ellington投資的股價對他們的交易行動敏感。
  • 前21大股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

A look at the shareholders of Ellington Financial Inc. (NYSE:EFC) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 56% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看Ellington投資股票的股東,我們可以知道哪個群體最有力量。我們可以看到機構在公司中佔有最多的股份,達56%的所有權。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的增長潛力(或下行風險)。

Last week's 5.5% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 7.5%.

上週5.5%的漲幅意味着機構投資者處於正面的位置,即使該公司已經表現出強勁的長期趨勢。上週的收益將進一步推動股東的股票回報率,目前爲7.5%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Ellington Financial.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東都可以告訴我們什麼關於Ellington投資的事情。

big
NYSE:EFC Ownership Breakdown July 15th 2024
紐交所:EFC所有權分佈2024年7月15日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ellington Financial?

機構投資者擁有Ellington投資的相當多的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經觀察了該股票並且他們很喜歡它。但正如其他任何人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,他們總會存在“擁擠”的交易風險。當這種交易出現錯誤時,多個方面可能會競相快速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Ellington投資的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更爲複雜的。

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Ellington Financial. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Ellington Financial's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

紐交所:EFC營收和收益增長2024年7月15日

big
NYSE:EFC Earnings and Revenue Growth July 15th 2024
投資者應該注意,機構實際擁有超過公司的一半股份,因此他們可以集體發揮重大影響力。我們注意到對沖基金對Ellington投資沒有實質性的投資。該公司最大的股東是黑石集團,持有16%的所有權。第二大股東是Vanguard Group,持有普通股的5.7%,Ranger Global Real Estate Advisors,LLC 持有該公司股票的約5.1%。

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Ellington Financial. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 16%. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 5.7% of common stock, and Ranger Global Real Estate Advisors, LLC holds about 5.1% of the company stock.

Ellington投資內部股權 我們可以報告,內部人員確實擁有Ellington投資的股份。這是一個相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能具有重要意義的內部利益一致性,通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有大約3000萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算),如果您想探討內部對齊的問題,則可以在此處單擊以查看內部人員是否一直在買賣。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 21 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

更詳細的所有權情況表明,前21大股東擁有50%的股份,意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師建議是了解股票預期表現的更深入的做法。相當多的分析師都對該股票進行了研究,因此您可以輕鬆地查看預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Ellington Financial

擁有41%股權的普通投資者,大多是個人投資者,對Ellington投資有一定影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以在政策決策時左右公司的立場,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Ellington Financial Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$30m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。爲此,您應該了解Ellington投資的4個警告信號(包括2個潛在嚴重問題).

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 41% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Ellington Financial. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

機構持股的比例高意味着Ellington投資的股價對他們的交易行動敏感。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with Ellington Financial (including 2 which are potentially serious) .

儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。爲此,您應該了解Ellington投資的4個警告信號(包括2個潛在嚴重問題)。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論