share_log

With 89% Institutional Ownership, KLA Corporation (NASDAQ:KLAC) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 89% Institutional Ownership, KLA Corporation (NASDAQ:KLAC) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

憑藉89%的機構持股比例,KLA Corporation (納斯達克:KLAC) 成爲大型機構的最愛
Simply Wall St ·  07/15 14:23

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies KLA's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 18 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 機構持有份額較高,這意味着KLA的股票價格對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 共有18家投資者擁有該公司51%的所有權。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of KLA Corporation (NASDAQ:KLAC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 89% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解KLA Corporation (納斯達克:KLAC)究竟由誰掌控,了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。這個公司所佔比例最大的股東是持有89%股份的機構。換句話說,這個集團會從他們對公司的投資中獲益最多(或者失去最多)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有大量的資金和研究能力,因此機構所有權往往具有相當的分量,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構在一家企業中投資的規模可視爲該企業的一項重要資產。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of KLA.

如下圖所示,我們重點關注KLA的不同持股群體。

big
NasdaqGS:KLAC Ownership Breakdown July 15th 2024
納斯達克:KLAC所有權分佈情況,截至2024年7月15日。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About KLA?

機構所有權告訴我們關於KLA的一些信息。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that KLA does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see KLA's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到KLA確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股份的很大一部分。這意味着爲那些機構工作的分析師們認爲該股票值得關注,並且他們喜歡這個股票。但是和其他所有人一樣,他們可能會犯錯。當多個機構持有一支股票時,總會有當它們處於“擁擠交易”中風險更高的情況。當這樣的交易發生問題時,多個交易參與方可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面查看KLA的歷史收入和營業收入,但請記住,還有更多未被揭示的信息。

big
NasdaqGS:KLAC Earnings and Revenue Growth July 15th 2024
納斯達克:KLAC營收和收入增長情況,截至2024年7月15日。

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in KLA. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.7% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.4% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.3% of the company stock.

投資者應該注意到,機構實際上擁有公司的一半以上,因此他們可以集體行使重要的權力。對於KLA,對沖基金持股並不多。根據我們的數據,最大的股東是The Vanguard Group,擁有9.7%的流通股,第二大股東是擁有8.4%普通股的BlackRock,Inc.,而State Street Global Advisors,Inc.持有公司股票約4.3%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 18 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

更詳細地觀察我們的所有權數據表明,前18位股東擁有51%的聯合所有權,意味着沒有單一的股東擁有大多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師建議是了解股票預期表現的更深入的做法。相當多的分析師都對該股票進行了研究,因此您可以輕鬆地查看預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of KLA

KLA的內部所有權。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of KLA Corporation. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$133m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據表明內部人員擁有KLA Corporation股份的比例不到1%。這是一家非常大的公司,因此公司內部人員擁有的比例很少。儘管他們的持股不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共持有超過1,330萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。在這種情況下,更有意思的是要看看這些內部人員是買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over KLA. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有10%的普通投資者,主要是個人投資者,對KLA具有一定的影響力。儘管持有股份很多,但如果該決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能無法改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for KLA that you should be aware of.

我發現查看公司實際上由誰擁有非常有趣。但是要真正獲得見解,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了KLA的1個警告信號,您應該注意到。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論