share_log

Merck & Co., Inc. (NYSE:MRK) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 78% of the Company

Merck & Co., Inc. (NYSE:MRK) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 78% of the Company

默沙東公司(紐交所:MRK)受機構股東青睞,其持股比例達到公司總股份的78%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/15 15:34

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Merck's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 45% of the company
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 由於機構持有Merck的大股份,該公司的股價可能受到他們交易決策的影響。
  • 前25名股東擁有該公司的45%股份。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

If you want to know who really controls Merck & Co., Inc. (NYSE:MRK), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 78% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道誰真正控制着默沙東公司(NYSE:MRK),那麼您需要查看它的股東登記表的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,佔比78%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

因爲機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往帶有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者來說。因此,機構投資在一家公司中的大量資金通常被視爲一個積極因素。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Merck.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了默沙東的不同所有權組的股權。

big
NYSE:MRK Ownership Breakdown July 15th 2024
NYSE:MRk所有權結構拆分圖(2024年7月15日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Merck?

機構所有權對默沙東預示着什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Merck already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Merck's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

默沙東已經有機構登記在股東名冊上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過該股票並且他們喜歡它。但是和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果多個機構同時改變對一支股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看默沙東以下的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:MRK Earnings and Revenue Growth July 15th 2024
NYSE:MRk盈利和營業收入增長圖(2024年7月15日)

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Merck. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 9.6% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.2% and 4.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由於機構投資者擁有超過半數的已發行股票,董事會可能會需要關注他們的偏好。我們注意到對沖基金在默沙東沒有實質性的投資。我們的數據顯示,The Vanguard Group,Inc. 是最大的股東,擁有已發行股票的9.6%。同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有已發行股票的8.2%和4.6%。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師建議是了解股票預期表現的更深入的做法。相當多的分析師都對該股票進行了研究,因此您可以輕鬆地查看預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Merck

默沙東的內部股權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Merck & Co., Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$217m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的數據表明,內部人員在Merck & Co.,Inc.的個人名下擁有不到1%的股份。由於公司規模如此之大,我們不會期望內部人員擁有公司股份的很大比例。他們共擁有2,170萬美元的股票。董事會成員擁有公司股份是好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人員是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般投資者--包括散戶--持有該公司22%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這種擁有股份的規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面促使政策決策的改變,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for Merck that you should be aware of.

我發現看一家公司究竟由誰擁有很有趣。但是爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了默沙東的4個警示信號,您應該意識到他們。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論