Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as Shenzhen Xinyichang Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688383) Touches CN¥4.9b Market Cap
Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as Shenzhen Xinyichang Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688383) Touches CN¥4.9b Market Cap
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant insider control over Shenzhen Xinyichang Technology implies vested interests in company growth
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 67% ownership
- 16% of Shenzhen Xinyichang Technology is held by Institutions
- 深圳新意暢科技的重要內部控制意味着對公司增長的利益相關者。
- 共有2名投資者擁有該公司的67%所有權。
- 16%的深圳新意暢科技由機構持有。
A look at the shareholders of Shenzhen Xinyichang Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688383) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 69% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看看深圳新意暢科技(SHSE:688383)的股東,就可以知道哪個團體最強大。在公司中持有最多股份的團體,準確地說是約69%的股份,是個人內部人。換句話說,該團體最有可能從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大的收益(或虧損)。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥522m last week.
很明顯,內部人在上週公司的市值上升了5,2200萬元後獲益最多。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shenzhen Xinyichang Technology.
讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們什麼關於深圳新意暢科技。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240716/0-a8be527340e971d410fd8185a914199d-0-a5144c8a7e1394fe2f88baa27b42e7ce.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen Xinyichang Technology?
機構所有權告訴我們什麼關於深圳新意暢科技?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Shenzhen Xinyichang Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shenzhen Xinyichang Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
深圳新意暢科技已經有機構投資者持有。的確,他們持有該公司的相當一部分股份。這表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好不要依靠機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也會犯錯誤,如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出股票,股價會經常大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查深圳新意暢科技的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,要記住還有其他因素要考慮。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240716/0-a8be527340e971d410fd8185a914199d-1-73996dccd06fadd26a454be8dbd044b2.png/big)
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shenzhen Xinyichang Technology. Our data shows that Xinrong Hu is the largest shareholder with 37% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 30% and 2.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Changning Song, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
對於深圳新意暢科技,對沖基金並不持有很多股份。我們的數據顯示,Xinrong Hu是持有流通股的最大股東,佔37%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的30%和2.2%。第二大股東Changning Song也恰好兼任首席執行官。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 67% stake.
常州凱迪電氣的內部人擁有明顯的股權。它的市值僅爲2.8億元人民幣,內部人擁有6.25億元人民幣的股份。我們認爲這表現出與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相當小;一些內部人物可能創建了該業務。您可以單擊此處以查看那些內部人物是否一直在買賣。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。
Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen Xinyichang Technology
深圳新意暢科技的內部人所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
It seems that insiders own more than half the Shenzhen Xinyichang Technology Co., Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. Given it has a market cap of CN¥4.9b, that means they have CN¥3.4b worth of shares. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起來內部人擁有深圳新意暢科技有限公司股票的一半以上。這使他們擁有很大的權力。鑑於其市值爲49億元,這意味着他們擁有34億元的股份。很高興看到這種投資水平。您可以在此處檢查,看看這些內部人最近是否有購買。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Shenzhen Xinyichang Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
通常是個人投資者的普通公衆持有深圳新意暢科技的13%股份。雖然這種所有權大小可能不足以影響他們對政策決策的支持,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Shenzhen Xinyichang Technology has 3 warning signs (and 1 which shouldn't be ignored) we think you should know about.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同團體是值得的,但其他因素更爲重要。例如承擔風險-深圳新意暢科技存在3個警告信號(以及1個不應被忽視的信號),我們認爲您應該了解一下。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。