share_log

Recent Uptick Might Appease Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:PGC) Institutional Owners After Losing 12% Over the Past Year

Recent Uptick Might Appease Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:PGC) Institutional Owners After Losing 12% Over the Past Year

過去一年來,Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (納斯達克代碼:PGC)的機構股東損失了12%,最近的上漲可能會讓他們感到滿意。
Simply Wall St ·  07/16 08:26

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 11 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構所有權的持續增加意味着Peapack-Gladstone Financial的股價對它們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 前11大股東擁有該公司51%的股份。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

If you want to know who really controls Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:PGC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 75% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation(納斯達克:PGC),那麼你需要看看它的股權登記簿構成。擁有公司股份數量最多的持有者是機構,具體來說是約75%。換句話說,該集團面臨的上行潛力(或下行風險)最大。

Institutional investors would appreciate the 15% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 12%.

機構投資者很欣賞上週15%股價的增長,鑑於他們的一年損失總計達到令人失望的12%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Peapack-Gladstone Financial.

讓我們更仔細地查看不同類型的股東對Peapack-Gladstone Financial的影響。

big
NasdaqGS:PGC Ownership Breakdown July 16th 2024
納斯達克GS:PGC所有權分解2024年7月16日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Peapack-Gladstone Financial?

機構所有權告訴我們Peapack-Gladstone Financial的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Peapack-Gladstone Financial. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Peapack-Gladstone Financial's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Peapack-Gladstone Financial持有相當多的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票,並且他們很喜歡它。但像任何人一樣,他們也可能錯了。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,它們總是有可能進行 '人頭攢動交易',這種情況下,多方可能會競相快速售出股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Peapack-Gladstone Financial的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,這個故事總是更加複雜。

big
NasdaqGS:PGC Earnings and Revenue Growth July 16th 2024
納斯達克GS:PGC收益和收入增長2024年7月16日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 8.3% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.1% and 6.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that Douglas Kennedy, the CEO has 0.5% of the shares allocated to their name.

機構投資者持有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會決策。我們注意到,對於Peapack-Gladstone Financial,對沖基金的投資並沒有很大的意義。查看我們的數據,我們可以看到最大股東是BlackRock,Inc.,持有8.3%的流通股。同時,第二大和第三大股東,分別持有流通股的7.1%和6.1%。此外,我們發現CEO Douglas Kennedy名下的股份分配爲0.5%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更深入的了解,我們發現前11名在該公司擁有51%的所有權,表明沒有單一的股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Peapack-Gladstone Financial

Peapack-Gladstone Financial的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$425m, and insiders have US$45m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人員擁有相當比例的Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation股份。它的市值只有4250萬美元,內部人員名下持有4500萬美元的股票。我們可以說這顯示了他們和股東的利益一致,但值得注意的是,公司規模仍然相當小;一些內部人員可能創立了這個公司。 點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在買賣股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Peapack-Gladstone Financial. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

通常是個人投資者的普通公衆持有Peapack-Gladstone Financial 15%的股份。儘管持股量相當可觀,但如果他們的決策與其他大股東不同步,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Peapack-Gladstone Financial .

我非常有興趣查看到底是誰擁有一家公司。但爲了真正獲得洞見,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該注意Peapack-Gladstone Financial的兩個警告信號 。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論