share_log

Repligen (NASDAQ:RGEN) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet

Repligen (NASDAQ:RGEN) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet

Repligen(納斯達克:RGEN)擁有一張相當健康的資產負債表
Simply Wall St ·  07/16 13:51

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that Repligen Corporation (NASDAQ:RGEN) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

傳說中的基金經理李錄(查理·芒格支持的人)曾經說過:“最大的投資風險不是價格的波動性,而是你是否會遭受到永久性資本損失。” 當我們思考一家公司有多大風險時,我們總是喜歡看它是否使用債務,因爲過度的債務可能導致破產。 我們可以看到Repligen Corporation (納斯達克:RGEN)確實在業務中使用了債務。 但這個債務是否會讓股東感到擔憂呢?

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

債務帶來了什麼風險?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

通常情況下,只有當公司無法輕鬆償還債務時,債務才會成爲真正的問題,無論是通過籌集資金還是通過自身現金流。資本主義的一部分是“創造性毀滅”的過程,銀行家無情地清算着失敗的企業。然而,更常見(但仍然痛苦)的情況是,公司必須以低價募集新的股權資本,從而永久地稀釋股東的權益。話雖如此,最常見的情況是,一家公司合理地管理其債務,並對自身有利。當我們考慮債務水平時,我們首先考慮現金和債務水平的整體情況。

How Much Debt Does Repligen Carry?

Repligen承擔了多少債務?

As you can see below, at the end of March 2024, Repligen had US$583.4m of debt, up from US$285.1m a year ago. Click the image for more detail. But it also has US$780.6m in cash to offset that, meaning it has US$197.2m net cash.

正如下面所示,截至2024年3月底,Repligen的債務爲58340萬美元,較一年前的28510萬美元增加。點擊圖像以了解更多詳情。但它也有78060萬美元的現金來抵消,這意味着它擁有19720萬美元的淨現金。

big
NasdaqGS:RGEN Debt to Equity History July 16th 2024
NasdaqGS:RGEN債務與股權歷史記錄2024年7月16日

A Look At Repligen's Liabilities

查看Repligen的負債情況

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Repligen had liabilities of US$178.3m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$700.4m due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$780.6m as well as receivables valued at US$115.8m due within 12 months. So it actually has US$17.7m more liquid assets than total liabilities.

通過查看最新負債表數據,我們可以看到Repligen有17830萬美元的負債在12個月內到期,還有7.004億美元的負債超過12個月。與此同時,它有78060萬美元的現金以及價值11580萬美元的應收賬款在12個月內到期。因此,它實際上比總負債多了1770萬美元的流動資產。這種情況表明Repligen的資產負債表看起來非常堅實,因爲其總負債與流動資產幾乎相等。因此,這家市值達70.4億美元的公司很少會缺乏現金,但仍值得關注其資產負債表。簡而言之,Repligen擁有淨現金,因此可以說它並沒有沉重的債務負擔!

This state of affairs indicates that Repligen's balance sheet looks quite solid, as its total liabilities are just about equal to its liquid assets. So it's very unlikely that the US$7.04b company is short on cash, but still worth keeping an eye on the balance sheet. Succinctly put, Repligen boasts net cash, so it's fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load!

事實上,Repligen的救命稻草是其較低的債務水平,因爲其息稅前利潤(EBIt)在過去十二個月中已經暴跌了85%。當談到償還債務時,下降的收益和含糖飲料對健康也沒有什麼用處。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表上了解債務最多。但比起資產負債表,未來的盈利更能決定Repligen保持健康的資產負債表的能力。因此,如果你想知道專業人士的看法,你可能會發現這份免費的分析師盈利預測報告非常有趣。

In fact Repligen's saving grace is its low debt levels, because its EBIT has tanked 85% in the last twelve months. When it comes to paying off debt, falling earnings are no more useful than sugary sodas are for your health. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Repligen's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

最後,企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤並不能解決問題。雖然Repligen的資產負債表上有淨現金,但查看其將息稅前利潤(EBIT)轉化爲自由現金流的能力以幫助我們了解它正在多快地積累(或侵蝕)現金餘額也很值得。在最近的三年中,Repligen的自由現金流佔息稅前利潤的49%,這比我們預期的要弱。這種較弱的現金轉換使其更難處理債務負擔。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. While Repligen has net cash on its balance sheet, it's still worth taking a look at its ability to convert earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) to free cash flow, to help us understand how quickly it is building (or eroding) that cash balance. Looking at the most recent three years, Repligen recorded free cash flow of 49% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.

雖然我們同情那些認爲債務令人擔憂的投資者,但你必須記住Repligen擁有19720萬美元的淨現金,以及更多的流動資產。因此,我們對Repligen的債務使用沒有問題。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是明顯的起點。然而,並不是所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中-遠非如此。事實上:我們已經發現Repligen的3個警告信號,你應該注意。

Summing Up

總之

While we empathize with investors who find debt concerning, you should keep in mind that Repligen has net cash of US$197.2m, as well as more liquid assets than liabilities. So we are not troubled with Repligen's debt use. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Repligen you should be aware of.

總之,研究表明,最大的投資風險不是價格的波動性,而是你是否會遭受到永久性資本損失。當我們思考一家公司有多大風險時,我們總是喜歡看它是否使用債務,因爲過度的債務可能導致破產。我們可以看到Repligen Corporation(納斯達克:RGEN)確實使用了債務,但在資產負債表方面相對較爲堅實。儘管我們同情那些認爲債務令人擔憂的投資者,但你必須記住Repligen擁有19720萬美元的淨現金,以及更多的流動資產。因此,我們對Repligen的債務使用沒有問題。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是明顯的起點。然而,並不是所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中-遠非如此。事實上:我們已經發現Repligen的3個警告信號,你應該注意。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果您在所有這些工作之後,更感興趣於擁有堅實資產負債表的快速發展公司,請立即查看我們的淨現金成長股列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論