share_log

With 83% Ownership in Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:SAFT), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 83% Ownership in Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:SAFT), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

機構投資者在安全保險集團有83%股權(NASDAQ:SAFT),其業務前途一片光明。
Simply Wall St ·  07/16 15:10

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Safety Insurance Group's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 5 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 考慮到機構佔有該股票的大部分股權,Safety Insurance Group的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
  • 前五大股東持有該公司52%的股份。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

A look at the shareholders of Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:SAFT) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 83% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看Safety Insurance Group, Inc.(納斯達克:SAFT)的股東可以告訴我們哪一組最爲強大。持有公司股票數量最多的一組,精確到83%,是機構。換句話說,該組最有可能(或者最可能)從他們對公司的投資中獲利或者受損。

Last week's 5.0% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 26%.

上週5.0%的漲幅意味着機構投資者在公司表現強勁的長期趨勢中也保持了正面的態度。上週的收益會進一步提高股東的一年回報,目前的回報率爲26%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Safety Insurance Group.

讓我們更仔細地了解一下不同類型的股東對Safety Insurance Group有什麼影響。

big
NasdaqGS:SAFT Ownership Breakdown July 16th 2024
納斯達克GS:SAFt所有權分解2024年7月16日。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Safety Insurance Group?

機構所有權對Safety Insurance Group有何啓示?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Safety Insurance Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Safety Insurance Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Safety Insurance Group已經有機構登記股份註冊。他們在該公司擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲那些機構工作的分析師已經看過股票並看好它。但像其他人一樣,他們可能會錯。當多個機構持有股票時,存在因‘擁擠交易’而出錯的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個交易方可能會競相快速賣出股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到Safety Insurance Group的歷史收益和營業收入,但要記住,故事總是有更多的內涵。

big
NasdaqGS:SAFT Earnings and Revenue Growth July 16th 2024
納斯達克GS:SAFt收益和營業收入增長2024年7月16日。

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Safety Insurance Group. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 15% of shares outstanding. With 12% and 11% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Plymouth Rock Company Incorporated, Asset Management Arm and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO George Murphy directly holds 0.7% of the total shares outstanding.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會共同影響董事會決策。我們注意到對Safety Insurance Group沒有意義的對沖基金。目前BlackRock, Inc.是最大的股東,持有15%的流通股。The Plymouth Rock Company Incorporated資產管理部和The Vanguard Group, Inc.分別持有12%和11%的流通股,是第二和第三大股東。此外,公司的CEO George Murphy直接持有佔總流通股的0.7%。

On looking further, we found that 52% of the shares are owned by the top 5 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

進一步了解後,我們發現52%的股份由前5名股東持有。 換句話說,這些股東對公司的決策有相當大的影響。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但考慮到分析師的看法,了解風向也是有意義的。我們的信息表明,該股票沒有任何分析師的覆蓋,因此它可能鮮爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Safety Insurance Group

我們可以看到內部人士在絲芙蘭保險集團擁有股份……這是一家大公司,因此看到這種程度的一致性非常好。內部人士擁有價值5300萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內部人士對齊的問題,請單擊此處查看內部人士是否一直在購買或出售。

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Safety Insurance Group, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$53m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

了解公司持有股份的不同群體始終是值得考慮的問題。但是,要更好地了解Safety Insurance Group,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該注意我們發現的2個警告信號。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,包括零售投資者,擁有該公司12%的股權,因此不能被忽視。儘管這種所有權的大小可能不足以爲他們爭取政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Safety Insurance Group better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Safety Insurance Group .

當我們了解Safety Insurance Group時,始終值得思考擁有股份的不同群體。但是,要更好地了解它,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該注意我們發現的2個警告信號。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然,您可能會在其他地方找到一項出色的投資。因此,請查看此免費的有趣公司列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論