share_log

Positive Week for Glodon Company Limited (SZSE:002410) Institutional Investors Who Lost 65% Over the Past Year

Positive Week for Glodon Company Limited (SZSE:002410) Institutional Investors Who Lost 65% Over the Past Year

廣聯達公司有利的一週 (SZSE:002410)過去一年中虧損了65%的機構投資者
Simply Wall St ·  07/16 21:48

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Glodon implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 17 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • 32% of Glodon is held by insiders
  • 機構對廣聯達的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價有重要影響。
  • 共有17家投資者持有該公司的大部分股權,佔51%的所有權。
  • 32%的廣聯達股權由內部人持有。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Glodon Company Limited (SZSE:002410), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 34% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

爲了了解誰真正控制廣聯達的公司 (SZSE: 002410),了解其業務的所有權結構就變得非常重要。擁有34%的股權的機構持股群體掌控着最大的商業份額。換句話說,該群體從其對該公司的投資中獲得或損失最多。

Institutional investors would appreciate the 17% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 65%.

機構投資者對上週股價上漲17%非常欣慰,儘管他們一年的虧損已經達到了失望的65%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Glodon.

讓我們更仔細地看看不同股東類型能告訴我們哪些關於廣聯達的情況。

big
SZSE:002410 Ownership Breakdown July 17th 2024
SZSE: 002410所有權分佈於2024年7月17日。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Glodon?

機構持股告訴我們關於廣聯達的什麼信息?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

Glodon already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Glodon, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

廣聯達已經有機構在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司中持有不錯的股份。這表明專業投資者之間存在一定的信任和公信力。但是,我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會犯投資錯誤,就像每個人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出某個股票,那麼看到股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查廣聯達的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,還要注意其他因素。

big
SZSE:002410 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 17th 2024
SZSE: 002410營收收入和增長於2024年7月17日。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Glodon. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Glodon's case, its Top Key Executive, Zhi Zhong Diao, is the largest shareholder, holding 16% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 4.8% and 4.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Jinhong Wang is also a Chairman of Corporate Board, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

對於廣聯達而言,對於大股東持有的股份,行動比言語更能說明一切。 Zhi Zhong Diao是廣聯達的最大股東,持有16%的流通股。而第二和第三大股東則分別持有流通股的4.8%和4.3%。有趣的是,第三大股東金紅王也是董事會主席,這再次表明該公司最大股東之間存在較強的內部股權。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 17 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

通過進一步的調查,我們發現前17名股東在公司中的持有總比例爲51%,表明沒有單一的股東對公司有重要控制力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Glodon

廣聯達的內部人持有情況。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Glodon Company Limited. Insiders own CN¥5.3b worth of shares in the CN¥17b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人持有廣聯達公司相當大的比例。內部人擁有CN¥53億的廣聯達CN¥170億公司股票,這相當有意義。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望訪問此免費圖表,以顯示最近的內部交易。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 33% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆--包括散戶股東--擁有公司33%的股權,因此他們無法輕易被忽略。儘管這種所有權尺寸可能不足以使政策決策朝他們的方向傾斜,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Glodon has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

雖然考慮到擁有某家公司的不同團體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,風險 - 廣聯達存在2項風險信號,我們認爲您應該知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論