share_log

Shore Bancshares, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SHBI) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 19% Over the Past Week

Shore Bancshares, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SHBI) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 19% Over the Past Week

隨着股票在過去一週內上漲19%,Shore Bancshares,Inc.(納斯達克:SHBI)的大型機構股東應該非常高興。
Simply Wall St ·  07/17 10:13

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Shore Bancshares' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 22 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 機構投資者持股比例顯著高,說明Shore Bancshares的股價對他們的交易行動非常敏感。
  • 總共有22個投資者擁有該公司的多數股份,擁有50%的所有權。
  • 內部人士最近購買了股票。

Every investor in Shore Bancshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:SHBI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 45% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Shore Bancshares, Inc. (納斯達克:SHBI)的每個投資者都應該了解最有力的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司45%的持股。換句話說,該組面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$73m in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 14%.

上週該公司市值增加了7300萬美元,機構投資者的情況正在好轉。上週的收益將進一步提高股東的一年回報率,目前爲14%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shore Bancshares.

讓我們更近距離地觀察一下Shore Bancshares的不同股東類型可以告訴我們什麼。

big
NasdaqGS:SHBI Ownership Breakdown July 17th 2024
納斯達克GS:SHBI所有權拆分於2024年7月17日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shore Bancshares?

機構持股告訴我們什麼關於Shore Bancshares?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shore Bancshares. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Shore Bancshares' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Shore Bancshares中擁有相當大的股份。這表明其在專業投資者中享有一定的信譽。但僅僅依靠這一事實是不足以對該公司的投資進行可靠的評估的,因爲機構有時會犯錯誤,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在着他們涉及的“擁擠交易”的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Shore Bancshares的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更加複雜。

big
NasdaqGS:SHBI Earnings and Revenue Growth July 17th 2024
納斯達克GS:SHBI收入和營收增長於2024年7月17日

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 9.6% of Shore Bancshares. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. The company's largest shareholder is Fourthstone LLC, with ownership of 9.6%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.9% and 5.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Alan Hyatt, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.

我們的數據顯示,對沖基金擁有Shore Bancshares的9.6%。這很吸引人,因爲對沖基金有時試圖影響管理層或帶來創造近期股東價值的變化。該公司最大的股東是Fourthstone LLC,持有9.6%的股權。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有該公司已發行股份的8.9%和5.3%。而第三大股東Alan Hyatt還恰好擔任董事會主席的職務。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 22 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

更詳細的所有權數字表明,前22名股東擁有50%的股權,這意味着沒有單一的股東擁有佔據優勢的地位。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好禮。該股票受到的分析師覆蓋範圍很小,但不多。因此,它有更多的空間獲得更多的覆蓋範圍。

Insider Ownership Of Shore Bancshares

Shore Bancshares的內部股權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We can see that insiders own shares in Shore Bancshares, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$39m worth of stock in the US$422m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以看到,Shore Bancshares, Inc.的內部人士持有股份。內部人士擁有價值3900萬美元的股份在市值爲42200萬美元的公司中。有人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間存在共同利益。但值得注意的是,這些內部人士是否一直在出售這些股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 36% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Shore Bancshares. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有36%的股份,普通公衆,大部分是個人投資者,對Shore Bancshares具有一定的影響力。儘管佔據相當大的所有權,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能仍然無法改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Shore Bancshares has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

我非常有興趣看看究竟是誰擁有一家公司。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如風險- Shore Bancshares有3個警告信號,我們認爲您應該知道。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論