Possible Bearish Signals With Rambus Insiders Disposing Stock
Possible Bearish Signals With Rambus Insiders Disposing Stock
Many Rambus Inc. (NASDAQ:RMBS) insiders ditched their stock over the past year, which may be of interest to the company's shareholders. When evaluating insider transactions, knowing whether insiders are buying is usually more beneficial than knowing whether they are selling, as the latter can be open to many interpretations. However, when multiple insiders sell stock over a specific duration, shareholders should take notice as that could possibly be a red flag.
過去一年中,許多Rambus Inc. (NASDAQ:RMBS)內部人士拋售了他們的股票,這對於該公司的股東可能是有意思的。在評估內部交易時,知道內部人員是否在買入股票通常比知道他們是否在賣出股票更有益,因爲後者可能有許多不同的解讀。然而,當多名內部人員在特定時間範圍內售出股票時,股東應該注意,因爲這可能是一個警示標誌。
While we would never suggest that investors should base their decisions solely on what the directors of a company have been doing, we would consider it foolish to ignore insider transactions altogether.
雖然我們永遠不會建議投資者僅基於公司董事已經做出的決策而做出決策,但同時我們認爲完全忽略內部交易是愚蠢的。
The Last 12 Months Of Insider Transactions At Rambus
Rambus的最近12個月的內部交易情況
Over the last year, we can see that the biggest insider sale was by the Senior VP & COO, Xianzhi Fan, for US$952k worth of shares, at about US$54.99 per share. That means that an insider was selling shares at slightly below the current price (US$65.28). We generally consider it a negative if insiders have been selling, especially if they did so below the current price, because it implies that they considered a lower price to be reasonable. While insider selling is not a positive sign, we can't be sure if it does mean insiders think the shares are fully valued, so it's only a weak sign. This single sale was just 9.3% of Xianzhi Fan's stake.
過去一年中,我們可以看到Senior VP & COO Xianzhi Fan最大的內部賣出是出售價值95.2萬美元的股票,股票價格大約爲54.99美元每股。這意味着一名內部人士在略低於當前價格(65.28美元)的價格下出售了股票。我們通常認爲,如果內部人員一直在出售股票,特別是在當前價格下出售,這是一個負面信號,因爲這意味着他們認爲較低的價格是合理的。雖然內部人員的賣出不是一個積極的標誌,但我們不能確定這是否意味着內部人士認爲股票已經完全價值。因此,這只是一個微弱的信號。這一單售賣僅佔Xianzhi Fan持股量的9.3%。
In the last year Rambus insiders didn't buy any company stock. You can see the insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last year depicted in the chart below. By clicking on the graph below, you can see the precise details of each insider transaction!
過去一年中,Rambus內部人員沒有買入任何公司股票。您可以在下面的圖表中查看過去一年的內部交易(按公司和個人分類)。點擊下面的圖表,您可以查看每筆內部交易的詳細信息!
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240718/0-412e3ef710011c506f061b6534af9e20-0-ffe849132d94eb6ae19af7c7c8f2a442.png/big)
I will like Rambus better if I see some big insider buys. While we wait, check out this free list of undervalued and small cap stocks with considerable, recent, insider buying.
如果我看到內部人員有大量買入,那我會更喜歡Rambus。在等待時,可以查看這個免費的最新與小盤股票分享清單,這些股票的內部購買頻率相當高。
Insiders At Rambus Have Sold Stock Recently
Rambus的內部人員最近在出售股票
Over the last three months, we've seen significant insider selling at Rambus. In total, Independent Director Eric Stang sold US$643k worth of shares in that time, and we didn't record any purchases whatsoever. In light of this it's hard to argue that all the insiders think that the shares are a bargain.
過去三個月中,我們在Rambus看到了大量內部賣出。總體而言,在此期間,獨立董事Eric Stang出售了價值64.3萬美元的股票,而我們並沒有記錄任何購買行爲。考慮到這一點,很難說所有的內部人員都認爲股票是便宜的。
Does Rambus Boast High Insider Ownership?
Rambus是否擁有高內部所有權?
I like to look at how many shares insiders own in a company, to help inform my view of how aligned they are with insiders. A high insider ownership often makes company leadership more mindful of shareholder interests. Rambus insiders own about US$39m worth of shares. That equates to 0.6% of the company. This level of insider ownership is good but just short of being particularly stand-out. It certainly does suggest a reasonable degree of alignment.
我喜歡查看內部人員在公司中擁有多少股份,以幫助了解他們與內部人員的利益是否一致。高內部所有權往往使公司領導更加關注股東利益。Rambus內部人員擁有大約3900萬美元的股票,這相當於公司總量的0.6%。這種內部所有權程度很好,但並不突出。它確實暗示了一定程度的一致性。
What Might The Insider Transactions At Rambus Tell Us?
Rambus的內部交易可能向我們傳達什麼信息?
An insider sold stock recently, but they haven't been buying. And there weren't any purchases to give us comfort, over the last year. But since Rambus is profitable and growing, we're not too worried by this. While insiders do own shares, they don't own a heap, and they have been selling. We'd practice some caution before buying! While it's good to be aware of what's going on with the insider's ownership and transactions, we make sure to also consider what risks are facing a stock before making any investment decision. Our analysis shows 3 warning signs for Rambus (2 can't be ignored!) and we strongly recommend you look at these before investing.
最近,一名內部人員賣了股票,但他們沒有購買。過去一年中也沒有任何購買可以讓我們放心。但由於Rambus是盈利和增長的,我們並不太擔心這一點。雖然內部人員擁有股票,但他們不擁有太多,而且他們一直在賣出。在購買之前,我們要謹慎一些!雖然了解內部所有權和交易的情況很重要,但在做出任何投資決策之前,我們還要考慮股票面臨的風險。我們的分析顯示Rambus存在3個警告信號(其中2個不能被忽視!),強烈建議您在投資之前查看這些警告信號。
But note: Rambus may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with high ROE and low debt.
但請注意:Rambus可能不是您購買的最佳股票。因此,可以看一看這個免費的有高ROE和低債務的有趣企業清單。
For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests.
對於本文而言,內部人是指向相關監管機構報告其交易的個人。我們目前僅考慮公開市場交易和直接利益的私人處置,但不包括衍生交易或間接利益。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。