share_log

Institutional Investors Control 77% of ADMA Biologics, Inc. (NASDAQ:ADMA) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 15%

Institutional Investors Control 77% of ADMA Biologics, Inc. (NASDAQ:ADMA) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 15%

機構投資者控制ADMA Biologics, Inc. (納斯達克: ADMA) 的77%,股票上漲15%後上周獲得回報。
Simply Wall St ·  07/17 13:04

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies ADMA Biologics' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 19 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 顯著的高機構持股意味着ADMA Biologics的股票價格對其交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 前19名股東持有業務的50%。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

Every investor in ADMA Biologics, Inc. (NASDAQ:ADMA) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 77% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

ADMA Biologics,Inc. (納斯達克:adma)的每個投資者都應該注意最強大的股東群體。機構擁有公司的最大股份77%。換句話說,該群體面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 15% last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 285% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

因此,機構投資者在上週公司股價上漲15%後獲得了最大的回報。一年的投資回報率目前爲285%,上週的漲幅將更加受歡迎。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about ADMA Biologics.

讓我們更仔細地看一下不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關adma生物製品的信息。

big
NasdaqGM:ADMA Ownership Breakdown July 17th 2024
納斯達克GM: adma所有權分解7月17日,2024

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ADMA Biologics?

機構持股告訴我們什麼關於adma生物製品?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in ADMA Biologics. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at ADMA Biologics' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在adma生物製品方面有相當大的持股。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果多個機構同時改變自己對股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下降。因此,值得看一下adma biologics下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGM:ADMA Earnings and Revenue Growth July 17th 2024
納斯達克GM: adma盈利和營業收入的增長情況7月17日,2024

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in ADMA Biologics. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 7.9%. With 5.5% and 4.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Adam Grossman directly holds 1.1% of the total shares outstanding.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有超過公司一半的股份,因此他們可以共同行使重要的權力。對於adma生物製品,對沖基金並沒有太多股票。該公司最大的股東是BlackRock,Inc.,持有7.9%的股權。The Vanguard Group,Inc.和State Street Global Advisors,Inc.分別佔總流通股份的5.5%和4.6%,是該公司的第二大和第三大股東。此外,該公司的CEO Adam Grossman直接持有總流通股份的1.1%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 19 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股東登記簿,我們可以看到前19名股東控制了50%的股權,這意味着沒有單一股東掌控着多數股權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of ADMA Biologics

ADMA生物製品的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in ADMA Biologics, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$54m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們可以報告內部人員擁有ADMA生物製品公司的股票。這是一個相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在的有意義的投資是一件好事。在這種情況下,他們持有價值約5400萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。看到內幕人員有這麼多的投資是好事。您可以在這裏檢查看看這些內部人員最近是否購買了股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in ADMA Biologics. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆(通常是個人投資者)持有ADMA生物製品公司的21%股份。儘管股份相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,則可能不足以改變公司的政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand ADMA Biologics better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for ADMA Biologics you should know about.

總是值得考慮擁有一家公司股份的不同團體。但是要更好地了解adma生物製品,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。考慮風險,例如。每個公司都會有風險,我們已經發現了adma生物製品的2個警告信號,您應該知道這些信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論