share_log

Individual Investors Who Hold 50% of Rithm Capital Corp. (NYSE:RITM) Gained 7.7%, Institutions Profited as Well

Individual Investors Who Hold 50% of Rithm Capital Corp. (NYSE:RITM) Gained 7.7%, Institutions Profited as Well

持有Rithm Capital Corp.(紐交所:RITM)50%股份的個人投資者獲得了7.7%的收益,機構也獲得了利潤。
Simply Wall St ·  07/17 15:13

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over Rithm Capital by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 35% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Institutional ownership in Rithm Capital is 49%
  • 個人投資者對Rithm Capital的重要掌控意味着廣大公衆具有更大的影響力,可以影響有關管理和治理的決策。
  • 25個最大股東持有該公司的35%股份。
  • Rithm Capital的機構持股比例爲49%。

Every investor in Rithm Capital Corp. (NYSE:RITM) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 50% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

每位Rithm Capital股份持有者(NYSE:RITM)應該了解最有權勢的股東集團。持有50%股份的是個人投資者,即該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

While individual investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's US$396m market cap gain, institutions too had a 49% share in those profits.

儘管個人投資者是上週39600萬美元市值增長的最大受益者,但機構也分享了49%的利潤。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Rithm Capital.

下表展示了Rithm Capital的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:RITM Ownership Breakdown July 17th 2024
NYSE:RITm所有權分佈2024年7月17日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Rithm Capital?

機構所有權告訴我們Rithm Capital的什麼問題?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Rithm Capital already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Rithm Capital's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

Rithm Capital已經有機構投資者登記了股份,它們擁有該公司相當比例的股份,這可能意味着該公司在投資社區中具有一定的聲譽。但是,最好謹慎依賴所謂的機構投資者給予的認可。他們有時也會犯錯。如果多個機構同時改變他們的股票觀點,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得看一下Rithm Capital下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:RITM Earnings and Revenue Growth July 17th 2024
紐交所:RITm的收益和營業收入增長於2024年7月17日。

Rithm Capital is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.5% of shares outstanding. With 5.7% and 1.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Bank of America Corporation, Asset Management Arm are the second and third largest shareholders.

Rithm Capital不受對沖基金持有,根據我們的數據,最大股東是The Vanguard Group,Inc.,持有9.5%的流通股份。持有5.7%和1.8%流通股份的分別是BlackRock,Inc.和Bank of America Corporation,Asset Management Arm,它們是第二和第三大股東。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Rithm Capital

Rithm Capital的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Rithm Capital Corp. in their own names. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$28m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據表明,內部人員以自己的名義擁有Rithm Capital Corp.不到1%的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,所以董事會成員可以擁有公司的重要利益,而不擁有比例相對較高的利益。在這種情況下,他們持有價值約2800萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。可以說,最近的買賣也同樣值得考慮。你可以點擊此處查看內部人員是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 50% stake in Rithm Capital, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

普通大衆,通常是個人投資者,持有Rithm Capital 50%的股份,表明它是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。這種所有權水平使得廣大公衆投資者有一些權力來影響關鍵政策決策,比如董事會組成、高管薪酬和股息支付比率。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Rithm Capital better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Rithm Capital (at least 1 which can't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

總是值得考慮哪些群體擁有公司的股份。但爲了更好地了解Rithm Capital,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,投資風險始終存在。我們已經鑑定出Rithm Capital的2個警告信號(至少有1個不可忽視),了解它們應該成爲你的投資過程的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論