share_log

Institutional Investors Are Tradeweb Markets Inc.'s (NASDAQ:TW) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$746m Market Cap Gain

Institutional Investors Are Tradeweb Markets Inc.'s (NASDAQ:TW) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$746m Market Cap Gain

機構投資者是Tradeweb Markets Inc.(納斯達克代碼:TW)最大的投注者,並在上週市值增長74600萬美元后得到了回報。
Simply Wall St ·  07/17 15:57

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Tradeweb Markets implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 25 shareholders own 37% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構對Tradeweb Markets的實質性持股意味着他們對公司的股價有巨大影響。
  • 該公司前25大股東持有公司的37%。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

Every investor in Tradeweb Markets Inc. (NASDAQ:TW) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 54% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

納斯達克:TW的每個投資者都應該了解最強大的股東組。持有公司股票數量最多的是機構,準確地說,約爲54%。換句話說,該股東組將從對公司的投資中獲得最高的利益(或損失最多)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 3.4% last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 52% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

因此,上週公司股價上漲3.4%後,機構投資者獲得了最豐厚的回報。股東的一年回報率目前爲52%,上週的收益是錦上添花。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Tradeweb Markets, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討Tradeweb Markets每種所有者類型,從下圖開始。

big
NasdaqGS:TW Ownership Breakdown July 17th 2024
納斯達克GS:TW實際所有權結構2024年7月17日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Tradeweb Markets?

機構所有權告訴我們關於Tradeweb Markets的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Tradeweb Markets already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Tradeweb Markets, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Tradeweb Markets已經被機構股東所持有。事實上,他們持有的股份很可觀,這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖出售股票,則看到股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,檢查Tradeweb Markets的過去收益軌跡(如下)是值得的。當然,也要記住考慮其他因素。

big
NasdaqGS:TW Earnings and Revenue Growth July 17th 2024
納斯達克GS:TW收入和營收增長2024年7月17日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Tradeweb Markets. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 5.6% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.0% and 4.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此他們可以共同強烈影響董事會決策。對Tradeweb Markets的對沖基金持有的股票交相輝映。T. Rowe Price Group,Inc.目前是公司最大的股東,持有流通股的5.6%。同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股中的5.0%和4.9%。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Tradeweb Markets

Tradeweb Markets的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Tradeweb Markets Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$17m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據表明,股東在自己的名字下擁有不到1%的Tradeweb Markets股份。因爲該公司規模如此之大,我們不希望股東持有大比例的股票。他們共持有價值1700萬美元的股票。在這種情況下,更有趣的是看看內部人是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 46% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Tradeweb Markets. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

佔有46%的普通公衆投資者主要由個人投資者組成,擁有一定的影響力,但他們無法決定公司的命運。儘管如此,普通公衆投資者仍然可以對公司的運營產生實際影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論