The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed Shentong Technology Group Co., Ltd (SHSE:605228) Insiders Who Own 72% of the Company
The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed Shentong Technology Group Co., Ltd (SHSE:605228) Insiders Who Own 72% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Shentong Technology Group's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- 56% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Lifeng Fang)
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 申通科技集團重要的內部股權暗示了對公司擴張的潛在利益。
- 一名股東(房立峯)持有該公司56%的股份。
- 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。
Every investor in Shentong Technology Group Co., Ltd (SHSE:605228) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 72% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
對於申通科技集團股份有了解的投資者應該注意最強大的股東集團。 我們可以看到,個人內部股東擁有公司的大部分股權達72%。 換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by CN¥486m.
因此,內部股東集體在市值下跌4,8600萬元後經歷了最高的虧損。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shentong Technology Group.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對申通科技集團有什麼影響。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shentong Technology Group?
機構所有權告訴我們有關申通科技集團的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Less than 5% of Shentong Technology Group is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. It is not uncommon to see a big share price rise if multiple institutional investors are trying to buy into a stock at the same time. So check out the historic earnings trajectory, below, but keep in mind it's the future that counts most.
申通科技集團少於5%的股份歸機構投資者所有。 這表明一些基金正在觀察這家公司,但許多人尚未購買股票。 如果該業務從這裏變得更強大,我們可能會看到更多機構希望購買。 如果多個機構投資者同時試圖購買股票,那麼股價上漲也很常見。 因此,請注意下面的歷史收益軌跡,但請記住,最重要的是未來。
Shentong Technology Group is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Lifeng Fang with 56% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 15% and 6.0% of the stock.
申通科技集團沒有被對沖基金持有。 查看我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是房立峯,持有56%的流通股。 這意味着他們對公司未來的控制權很大。 相比之下,第二大和第三大股東持有約15%和6.0%的股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但同時調查分析師建議也是很好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。我們目前沒有發現任何關於該公司的分析師報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Shentong Technology Group
申通科技集團的內部股權。
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Shentong Technology Group Co., Ltd. This gives them effective control of the company. That means they own CN¥2.6b worth of shares in the CN¥3.7b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們的信息表明,內部人員擁有申通科技集團有超過一半的股份。 這使他們有效地控制了公司。 這意味着他們擁有37億元公司中26億元的股份。 這相當有意義。 您可以在此處檢查這些內部人員近期是否購買。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Shentong Technology Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
擁有19%的普通公衆,主要是個人投資者,對申通科技集團有一定影響力。 儘管這個群體不能佔據主導地位,但它肯定可以對公司的運營產生實際影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 6.0%, of the Shentong Technology Group stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
私人公司擁有申通科技集團6.0%的股份。 私人公司可能是相關方。 有時內部人員通過在私人公司中持有而不是以個人身份持有一家上市公司來擁有對上市公司的利益。 儘管很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得進一步研究。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Shentong Technology Group (including 1 which doesn't sit too well with us) .
我發現查看公司所有權非常有趣。 但是,爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。 因此,您應該了解我們發現的兩個警告信號,其中一個信號不太好。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。