Does FRP Holdings (NASDAQ:FRPH) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Does FRP Holdings (NASDAQ:FRPH) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We note that FRP Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:FRPH) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
霍華德·馬克斯(Howard Marks)曾很好地表達了這一點,他說,與其擔心股價波動,“永久性損失的可能性是我擔心的風險……我認識的每一位實踐投資者都會擔心這一點。” 因此,當您考慮一隻股票有多大的風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務會使一家公司陷入困境。我們注意到FRP Holdings, Inc.(NASDAQ:FRPH)有負債在其資產負債表上。但真正的問題是,這些債務是否會使公司變得高風險。
When Is Debt Dangerous?
債務何時有危險?
Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
債務是幫助企業增長的工具,但如果企業無法償還債權人,那麼它就在他們的掌控之下。如果情況變得非常糟糕,債權人可以接管企業。然而,更常見的情況是,一家公司必須以價格便宜的股票稀釋股東,以控制債務。當然,很多公司使用債務來資助發展,而沒有任何負面後果。當我們思考一家公司的債務使用情況時,首先要考慮現金和債務的結合。
What Is FRP Holdings's Debt?
FRP Holdings的債務是什麼?
The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that FRP Holdings had US$178.7m in debt in March 2024; about the same as the year before. However, it does have US$152.5m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$26.3m.
下面的圖表詳細顯示,FRP Holdings在2024年3月有17870萬美元的債務,與去年大致相同。但它有15250萬美元的現金來抵消這些債務,導致淨債務約爲2630萬美元。
A Look At FRP Holdings' Liabilities
我們可以從最近的資產負債表中看到,FRP Holdings在一年內有389萬美元的到期負債,25290萬美元的逾期負債。另一方面,它擁有15250萬美元的現金和140萬美元的應收款。因此,其負債超過其現金和(短期)應收賬款總和10290萬美元。
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that FRP Holdings had liabilities of US$3.89m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$252.9m due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$152.5m and US$1.40m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$102.9m.
由於上市的FRP Holdings股份總價值爲56320萬美元,因此這種程度的負債似乎不會構成重大威脅。話雖如此,很明顯我們應繼續監控其資產負債表,以防情況反轉。
Since publicly traded FRP Holdings shares are worth a total of US$563.2m, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.
FRP Holdings的淨債務/ EBITDA比率約爲2.4,表明只是適度使用債務。鑑於其EBIt爲0.1萬(即淨收益),是其利息支出的指數級,這意味着其債務負擔輕如孔雀羽毛。股東應該知道,FRP Holdings的EBIt去年下降了77%。如果這種收益趨勢繼續下去,償還其債務將像把貓推上過山車一樣困難。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中了解債務的信息最多。但最終,每個公司都可能存在超出資產負債表之外的風險。爲此,您應該注意我們在FRP Holdings中發現的1個警告信號。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
爲了比較一個公司的債務與其收益的關係,我們計算其淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前的收益和利息前的收益(其利息覆蓋率)。因此,我們考慮了債務的絕對數量以及支付的利率。
FRP Holdings's net debt to EBITDA ratio of about 2.4 suggests only moderate use of debt. And its commanding EBIT of 1k times its interest expense, implies the debt load is as light as a peacock feather. Shareholders should be aware that FRP Holdings's EBIT was down 77% last year. If that earnings trend continues then paying off its debt will be about as easy as herding cats on to a roller coaster. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is FRP Holdings's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So when considering debt, it's definitely worth looking at the earnings trend. Click here for an interactive snapshot.
還有,儘管稅務官員可能喜歡會計盈利,但借貸人只接受冰冷的現金。因此,我們總是檢查EBIt轉化爲自由現金流的情況。在過去的兩年中,FRP Holdings實際上產生了比EBIt更多的自由現金流。在保持債權人的信任方面,沒有比流入現金更好的方法。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last two years, FRP Holdings actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. There's nothing better than incoming cash when it comes to staying in your lenders' good graces.
FRP Holdings的EBIt增長率在此分析中確實是一個真正的負面因素,儘管我們考慮的其他因素要好得多。毫無疑問,其利用EBIt覆蓋利息支出的能力相當炫目。當我們考慮上述所有因素時,我們認爲FRP Holdings在管理其債務方面做得相當好。但是,需要注意的是:我們認爲債務水平已經高到需要持續監控的程度。無疑,我們從資產負債表中了解債務的信息最多。但最終,每個公司都可能存在超出資產負債表之外的風險。因此,您應該注意我們在FRP Holdings中發現的1個警告信號。
Our View
我們的觀點
FRP Holdings's EBIT growth rate was a real negative on this analysis, although the other factors we considered were considerably better. There's no doubt that its ability to to cover its interest expense with its EBIT is pretty flash. When we consider all the elements mentioned above, it seems to us that FRP Holdings is managing its debt quite well. But a word of caution: we think debt levels are high enough to justify ongoing monitoring. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with FRP Holdings .
FRP Holdings的EBIt增長率在此分析中確實是一個真正的負面因素,儘管我們考慮的其他因素要好得多。毫無疑問,其利用EBIt覆蓋利息支出的能力相當炫目。當我們考慮上述所有因素時,我們認爲FRP Holdings在管理其債務方面做得相當好。但是,需要注意的是:我們認爲債務水平已經高到需要持續監控的程度。無疑,我們從資產負債表中了解債務的信息最多。但最終,每個公司都可能存在超出資產負債表之外的風險。因此,您應該注意我們在FRP Holdings中發現的1個警告信號。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
總的來說,專注於沒有淨債務的公司往往更好。您可以訪問我們的特別列表,其中包含這些公司(所有這些公司都有盈利增長的記錄)。這是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。