share_log

Individual Investors Who Hold 46% of Novavax, Inc. (NASDAQ:NVAX) Gained 33%, Institutions Profited as Well

Individual Investors Who Hold 46% of Novavax, Inc. (NASDAQ:NVAX) Gained 33%, Institutions Profited as Well

持有納斯達克(NASDAQ:NVAX)的46%股份的個人投資者獲得了33%的收益,機構也獲利了
Simply Wall St ·  07/18 10:08

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Novavax's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 48% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 諾瓦瓦克斯醫藥的重要個人投資者持股表明,關鍵決策受到來自更大公衆的股東的影響。
  • 共有25位投資者擁有這家公司48%的所有權。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

A look at the shareholders of Novavax, Inc. (NASDAQ:NVAX) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 46% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看Novavax, Inc. (納斯達克:NVAX) 的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。個人投資者擁有公司的最大股份,其持股比例爲46%。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

While individual investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 33% price gain, institutions also received a 41% cut.

雖然個人投資者是上週33%股價上漲後受益最多的群體,但機構也得到了41%的利潤。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Novavax.

讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們什麼關於諾瓦瓦克斯醫藥。

big
NasdaqGS:NVAX Ownership Breakdown July 18th 2024
NasdaqGS:NVAX持股結構於2024年7月18日。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Novavax?

諾瓦瓦克斯醫藥公司的機構投資持股告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Novavax. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Novavax, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如大家所看到的,機構投資者在諾瓦瓦克斯醫藥中有相當數量的持股。這表明專業投資者信任這家公司。但是我們不能光憑這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資決策,就像每個人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售某隻股票,那麼很可能會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查諾瓦瓦克斯醫藥的過去收益軌跡(詳見下文)。當然,還要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGS:NVAX Earnings and Revenue Growth July 18th 2024
NasdaqGS:NVAX的收益和營業收入增長於2024年7月18日。

It looks like hedge funds own 7.8% of Novavax shares. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 9.6% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.8% and 6.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

看起來對沖基金擁有諾瓦瓦克斯醫藥的7.8%股份。這引起了我的注意,因爲對沖基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或帶來變化,以爲股東創造近期價值。我們的數據顯示,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大的股東,持有9.6%的流通股。同時,第二大和第三大股東,各持有7.8%和6.7%的流通股。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師建議是了解股票預期表現的更深入的做法。相當多的分析師都對該股票進行了研究,因此您可以輕鬆地查看預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Novavax

諾瓦瓦克斯醫藥公司的內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Novavax, Inc.. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$7.8m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人士持有諾瓦瓦克斯醫藥不到1%的股份。這是一家大公司,所以即使是小比例的利益也可能在董事會和股東之間產生聯動效應。在這種情況下,內部人士持有780萬美元的股票。看到至少有一些內部人士持股總是好的,但值得檢查的是那些內部人士是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 46% stake in Novavax. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在諾瓦瓦克斯醫藥中持有46%的股份。雖然這個群體不能掌控公司,但它肯定會對公司經營產生實際影響。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 4.6% of Novavax. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

我們發現上市公司持有諾瓦瓦克斯醫藥的4.6%。很難說得準,但這表明它們之間存在糾纏的商業利益。這可能是一種戰略性的持股,因此值得關注該股權的變化。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Novavax (at least 3 which shouldn't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我覺得看看一個公司的股東到底是誰非常有趣。但要真正獲取洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。要考慮的一個因素是投資風險。我們已經識別出了諾瓦瓦克斯醫藥的4個警示信號(至少有3個不能忽視),了解它們應該成爲你的投資過程的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論