Great Week for Seres Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:MCRB) Institutional Investors After Losing 69% Over the Previous Year
Great Week for Seres Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:MCRB) Institutional Investors After Losing 69% Over the Previous Year
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Seres Therapeutics' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 機構持股比例較高,意味着Seres Therapeutics股票價格對他們的交易行動比較敏感
- 共有8家投資者擁有該公司的50%所有權。
- 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Seres Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:MCRB), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 41% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
爲了了解誰是真正控制Seres Therapeutics Inc. (納斯達克:MCRB)的人,了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。擁有該公司股份最多的是佔41%左右的機構。換句話說,該組織從其對公司的投資中獲得最大的收益(或損失)。
Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 50% increase in the share price after a year of 69% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.
機構投資者很可能歡迎股價上週的50%的漲幅,因爲負面年度達69%,這標誌着回報可能開始向好趨勢。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Seres Therapeutics, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討Seres Therapeutics的每一種業主類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Seres Therapeutics?
機構持股對Seres Therapeutics有何啓示?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that Seres Therapeutics does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Seres Therapeutics, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到Seres Therapeutics確實擁有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的大部分股票。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會犯錯,就像每個人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時清倉某隻股票,往往會看到股價大幅下跌。因此值得檢查Seres Therapeutics的過去收益軌跡(下面還有)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Seres Therapeutics. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Flagship Pioneering, Inc with 15% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 15% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.9% by the third-largest shareholder.
我們注意到,對Seres Therapeutics的投資還沒有達到可以影響其股價的水平。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是Flagship Pioneering,擁有15%的流通股。爲了提供背景,第二大股東持有約15%的流通股,第三大股東持有4.9%的股份。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
進一步調查發現,超過一半的Bentley Systems股份歸前8位股東所有,這表明大股東和小股東的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Seres Therapeutics
Seres Therapeutics的內部股權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Seres Therapeutics, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$192m, and the board has only US$1.6m worth of shares in their own names. Many tend to prefer to see a board with bigger shareholdings. A good next step might be to take a look at this free summary of insider buying and selling.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人員擁有Seres Therapeutics Inc.不到1%的股份。它的市值僅爲1.92億美元,董事會只持有160萬美元的股份。許多人傾向於看到持股較大的董事會。一個好的下一步可能是查看內部買賣的免費摘要。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 38% stake in Seres Therapeutics. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
通常是個人投資者的普通公衆持有Seres Therapeutics的38%的股份。儘管擁有大量股份可能很重要,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,它可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With an ownership of 15%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
擁有15%的股權的私募股權公司有能力在以創造價值爲中心的企業戰略中發揮作用。有時我們會看到私募股權長期停留,但總體上來說,他們的投資時間更短,而且像名稱所示,不太投資於公共公司。一段時間後,他們可能會尋求賣出並重新部署資本。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
We can see that public companies hold 4.9% of the Seres Therapeutics shares on issue. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
我們可以看到,上市公司在發行的Seres Therapeutics股票中持有4.9%。我們不能確定,但這很可能是一項戰略性的股份。這些企業可能是類似的,或者開展合作項目。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Seres Therapeutics has 4 warning signs (and 2 which are a bit concerning) we think you should know about.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,風險承擔——Seres Therapeutics有4個警告信號(和2個令人擔憂的信號)。我們認爲你應該知道。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。