share_log

Merck Gets Legal Victory As Appeals Court Dismisses Shingles Vaccine Some 1,200 Lawsuits

Merck Gets Legal Victory As Appeals Court Dismisses Shingles Vaccine Some 1,200 Lawsuits

默沙東獲得法律勝利,上訴法院駁回1,200起帶狀皰疹生物-疫苗訴訟。
Benzinga ·  14:55

Merck & Co Inc (NYSE:MRK) has reportedly secured a significant legal victory as the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of nearly 1,200 lawsuits concerning its Zostavax shingles vaccine.

據報道,默沙東公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:MRK)取得了重大的法律勝利,因爲美國第三巡迴上訴法院維持了對近1,200起有關其Zostavax帶狀皰疹疫苗的訴訟的駁回。

The court ruled that U.S. District Judge Harvey Bartle did not exceed his authority when he dismissed cases for failing to provide required clinical test results in response to a Lone Pine order.

法院裁定,美國地方法院法官哈維·巴特爾沒有根據Lone Pine的命令提供所需的臨床測試結果而駁回案件,並未超越其權限。

Mass torts increasingly use these orders to demand initial evidence, such as medical records, to substantiate claims early on.

大規模侵權者越來越多地使用這些命令來要求提供初步證據,例如醫療記錄,以儘早證實指控。

Also Read: What's Going On With Merck Stock On Monday?

另請閱讀:週一默沙東股票怎麼了?

Judge Bartle initiated the Lone Pine order in early 2022 following Merck's success in five bellwether cases, where plaintiffs failed to demonstrate through a PCR test that the vaccine, rather than prior exposure to the chickenpox virus, caused their shingles.

在默克成功審理了五起領頭羊案件之後,巴特爾法官於2022年初啓動了孤松令。在這些案件中,原告未能通過聚合酶鏈反應測試證明疫苗而不是先前接觸過水痘病毒是他們的帶狀皰疹造成的。

Reuters added that the order mandated all remaining plaintiffs to produce similar clinical evidence to support their claims.

路透社補充說,該命令要求所有剩餘的原告提供類似的臨床證據來支持他們的主張。

Plaintiffs' attorneys argued that PCR tests were not standard practice for diagnosing shingles, leading to a lack of available test results.

原告的律師辯稱,聚合酶鏈反應測試不是診斷帶狀皰疹的標準做法,導致缺乏可用的測試結果。

Merck countered that the cases lacked merit without conclusive evidence linking the vaccine to shingles.

默沙東反駁說,如果沒有確鑿的證據表明疫苗與帶狀皰疹有關,這些案例缺乏法律依據。

Despite opposition, Judge Bartle dismissed all cases, emphasizing the failure to provide adequate scientific backing for their claims.

儘管遭到反對,但巴特爾法官還是駁回了所有案件,強調未能爲他們的主張提供足夠的科學支持。

The 3rd Circuit upheld Bartle's decision, stating that plaintiffs had sufficient opportunity to justify their claims without PCR tests but failed to present alternative methodologies or scientific studies.

第三巡迴法院維持了巴特爾的裁決,稱原告有足夠的機會在沒有聚合酶鏈反應測試的情況下爲其主張辯護,但沒有提出其他方法或科學研究。

The court affirmed Bartle's discretion to manage the multidistrict litigation efficiently, albeit with acknowledgment of limits to judicial discretion.

法院確認了巴特爾有效管理多地區訴訟的自由裁量權,儘管承認司法自由裁量權有限。

Price Action: MRK stock is down 2.18% at $123.14 at last check Thursday.

價格走勢:週四最後一次檢查時,MrK股價下跌2.18%,至123.14美元。

Disclaimer: This content was partially produced with the help of AI tools and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.

免責聲明:此內容部分是在人工智能工具的幫助下製作的,並由Benzinga的編輯審閱和發佈。

  • FDA Declines To Approve Merck-Daiichi Sankyo Partnered Lung Cancer Drug.
  • 美國食品藥品管理局拒絕批准默克第一三共合作的肺癌藥物。

Image: Merck

圖片:默沙東

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論