share_log

Institutions Profited After Hut 8 Corp.'s (NASDAQ:HUT) Market Cap Rose US$406m Last Week but Individual Investors Profited the Most

Institutions Profited After Hut 8 Corp.'s (NASDAQ:HUT) Market Cap Rose US$406m Last Week but Individual Investors Profited the Most

上週Hut 8 corp.(納斯達克:HUT)市值上漲了40600萬美元,機構賺了錢,但個人投資者收益最高。
Simply Wall St ·  14:40

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Hut 8's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 25 shareholders own 39% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • Hut 8的主要個人投資者持有權表明,關鍵決定受到更大公衆的股東的影響。
  • 前二十五大股東佔公司的39%。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

Every investor in Hut 8 Corp. (NASDAQ:HUT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 57% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Hut 8 Corp. (NASDAQ: HUT)的所有投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東組。個人投資者擁有該公司的最大股份,其持股權爲57%。換句話說,如果股票上漲,該組將從中獲益最多(或如果出現下行趨勢,則損失最多)

Following a 29% increase in the stock price last week, individual investors profited the most, but institutions who own 21% stock also stood to gain from the increase.

在上週股價上漲29%之後,個人投資者獲益最多,但持有21%股票的機構也有望從漲幅中獲利。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Hut 8.

在下面的圖中,我們重點關注Hut 8的不同持股人組。

big
NasdaqGS:HUT Ownership Breakdown July 18th 2024
NasdaqGS:HUt所有權結構2024年7月18日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hut 8?

機構股權對Hut 8的影響如何?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hut 8. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Hut 8's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所見,機構投資者在Hut 8中持有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師們已經看過該股票並且他們喜歡它。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,它們總是存在 '擁擠交易' 的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個交易方可能會競相快速賣出股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到Hut 8的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更爲豐富。

big
NasdaqGS:HUT Earnings and Revenue Growth July 18th 2024
NasdaqGS:HUt盈利和營收增長2024年7月18日

It would appear that 10% of Hut 8 shares are controlled by hedge funds. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Coatue Management, L.L.C. is currently the largest shareholder, with 10% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.4% by the third-largest shareholder. Interestingly, the bottom two of the top three shareholders also hold the title of Top Key Executive and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively, suggesting that these insiders have a personal stake in the company.

看來Hut 8的股份中有10%受操縱基金的控制。這引起了我的關注,因爲對沖基金有時會試圖影響管理層或引發變革,從而爲股東創造近期價值。Coatue Management, L.L.C.是目前最大的股東,持有10%的流通股。爲了了解情況,第二大股東持有約7.0%的流通股,第三大股東持有3.4%的股份。有趣的是,前三大股東中的後兩名也擁有董事會主席和董事成員的頭銜,這表明這些內部人士對公司有個人利益關係。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Hut 8

Hut 8的內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Hut 8 Corp.. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.9b, and insiders have US$218m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明內部人士擁有Hut 8 Corp.的相當比例的股份。它的市值僅爲19億美元,內部人士擁有自己名下的2180萬美元的股份。這很重要。大多數人會說,特別是在這種規模的公司中,這表明與股東有良好的協調。單擊此處查看內部人士是否一直在購買或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 57% of Hut 8 shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

由個人投資者組成的社會公衆共持有Hut 8股份的57%。擁有這種所有權,散戶投資者可以共同在影響股東回報的決策中發揮作用,例如分紅政策和任命董事。他們還可以行使投票的權利,以決定一項併購是否會提高盈利能力。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Hut 8 you should be aware of, and 2 of them are a bit concerning.

我發現看到公司所有者的確切情況非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如:我們已經發現Hut 8有3個警示標誌,您應該了解其中2個有些令人擔憂。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論