share_log

TRS Information Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300229) Last Week's 5.0% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

TRS Information Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300229) Last Week's 5.0% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

拓爾思信息技術有限公司(SZSE:300229)上週下跌5.0%,必然令持有大量股份的散戶投資者感到失望。
Simply Wall St ·  07/18 20:38

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over TRS Information Technology by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 46% ownership
  • Institutional ownership in TRS Information Technology is 12%
  • 零售投資者對拓爾思信息技術的重要掌控意味着普通公衆有更多的權力來影響管理和治理決策。
  • 公司分爲25個投資者,共擁有46%的股份。
  • 拓爾思信息技術的機構持股比例爲12%。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of TRS Information Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300229), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 53% to be precise, is retail investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

了解拓爾思信息技術控制權真正所在的群體是十分重要的。擁有公司股份最多的群體,準確地說是約53%的零售投資者。也就是說,如果股票上漲,這個群體將獲得最大的收益(或者如果有下跌,則會損失最大)。

And following last week's 5.0% decline in share price, retail investors suffered the most losses.

在上週股價下跌5.0%之後,零售投資者遭受了最大虧損。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about TRS Information Technology.

讓我們更加仔細地看看不同類型的股東對拓爾思信息技術的影響。

big
SZSE:300229 Ownership Breakdown July 19th 2024
SZSE:300229所有權拆分2024年7月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About TRS Information Technology?

機構投資者對拓爾思信息技術有何啓示?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

TRS Information Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of TRS Information Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

拓爾思信息技術已經有機構投資者持股。在投資社區中,這可能意味着公司有一定的信譽度。但是,過度依賴被機構投資者認可的驗證是有風險的。機構投資者有時也會犯錯誤。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一隻股票,股價下跌也不是罕見的情況。因此,值得檢查拓爾思信息技術的過去盈利軌跡(如下所示)。當然,還有其他要考慮的因素。

big
SZSE:300229 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 19th 2024
SZSE:300229盈利和營業收入增長情況2024年7月19日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in TRS Information Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Xinke Interactive Technology Development Co., Ltd. with 28% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.5% and 3.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

對拓爾思信息技術而言,對沖基金持有的股份不多。從我們的數據來看,持有公司已發行股份最多的是新科互動技術發展有限公司,佔總發行股份的28%。同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有總髮行股份的5.5%和3.6%。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以了解風向正在往哪裏吹。雖然有一些分析師對該股票進行了覆蓋,但隨着時間的推移,它可能仍然會變得更加知名。

Insider Ownership Of TRS Information Technology

拓爾思信息技術的內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in TRS Information Technology Co., Ltd.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth CN¥143m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股東可能會有興趣了解內部人是否擁有拓爾思信息技術的股份。內部人擁有的有意義的股份價值14.3億人民幣。這被許多人看作是真正的好事情。大多數人會說這表明股東和董事會的利益是一致的。不過,檢查一下這些內部人是否一直在拋售也是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 53% stake in TRS Information Technology, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

普通公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有拓爾思信息技術53%的股份,表明這是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。由於持有這麼多股份,零售投資者可以在影響股東回報的決策上發揮集體作用,例如股息政策和董事會成員的任命。他們還可以行使權力對收購或併購進行投票,即使這可能不會提高公司的盈利能力。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 34%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到私人企業擁有已發行股份的34%。 私人企業可能是關聯方。 有時,內部人員通過控股私有公司而對一家上市公司產生利益,而不是以個人身份控股。 雖然很難得出任何籠統的結論,但值得注意的是進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for TRS Information Technology that you should be aware of.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經確定了對拓爾思信息技術存在2個警告信號,這是您應該注意的。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論