The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed Chengdu Haoneng Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603809) Insiders Who Own 55% of the Company
The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed Chengdu Haoneng Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603809) Insiders Who Own 55% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant insider control over Chengdu Haoneng Technology implies vested interests in company growth
- The top 7 shareholders own 53% of the company
- 14% of Chengdu Haoneng Technology is held by Institutions
- 豪能股份顯然有重要的內部控制,這意味着對公司的增長有着既得利益。
- 前7大股東擁有公司53%的股份
- 機構持有豪能股份14%的股份。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Chengdu Haoneng Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603809), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 55% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解控制豪能股份股票的真正掌握方,重要的是要理解該業務的所有權結構。持有55%所有權的是個人內部人群。也就是說,如果股票上漲,這些股東將獲益最多(如果出現下降,他們的損失也最大)。
And following last week's 9.5% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.
上週股價下跌9.5%,內部人員遭受最大的損失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Chengdu Haoneng Technology.
讓我們更仔細地了解不同類型的股東對豪能股份說了什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chengdu Haoneng Technology?
機構持股給我們關於豪能股份的什麼信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that Chengdu Haoneng Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Chengdu Haoneng Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到,豪能股份確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有該公司股票的一部分。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定的信譽度,但最好還是謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的認可。他們有時也會出錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價下跌是很常見的。所以值得查看豪能股份的過去收益軌跡(如下所述)。當然,也要記住有其他因素需要考慮。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Chengdu Haoneng Technology. Our data shows that Chao Dong Xiang is the largest shareholder with 18% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 6.9% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Zhang Yong is the owner of 4.3% of the company's shares.
對豪能股份而言,對沖基金持有的股份不多。我們的數據顯示,董超祥是最大的股東,持有該公司18%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持股約爲10%和6.9%。此外,張勇CEO持有公司股份的4.3%。
We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 53% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
股東可能會對內部持有Affirm Holdings股份的人感興趣。內部持股者擁有價值6.16億美元的實質性利益,我們有時會關注他們是否一直在買賣。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
雖然研究公司的機構持股可以增加研究價值,但研究分析師建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一個好習慣。該股票的一些分析人士需要更多的關注時間。
Insider Ownership Of Chengdu Haoneng Technology
豪能股份內部人員持有超過一半的所有權,這使他們有效地掌控了公司。考慮到其市值爲44億元人民幣,這意味着他們擁有24億元的股份。大多數人會高興地看到董事會與他們一起投資,您可以免費發現他們是否一直在買賣。
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Chengdu Haoneng Technology Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥4.4b, that means they have CN¥2.4b worth of shares. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
總是值得考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體。但是要更好地了解豪能股份,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,考慮到風險。每個公司都有風險,我們已經發現豪能股份有3個警示信號,您應該了解。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 30% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,在該公司持有30%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽略。雖然擁有這種所有權的規模可能不足以使決策在他們的利益中而翻轉,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Chengdu Haoneng Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Chengdu Haoneng Technology you should know about.
考慮到風險因素,了解豪能股份需要考慮許多因素,其中包括公司所有者的不同群體。每個公司都會有風險,我們已經發現了 3 個有關豪能股份的警示標誌,您應該了解。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。