Espressif Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688018) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Swee Ann Teo, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 4.6% Last Week
Espressif Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688018) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Swee Ann Teo, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 4.6% Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant insider control over Espressif Systems (Shanghai) implies vested interests in company growth
- The top 4 shareholders own 52% of the company
- 27% of Espressif Systems (Shanghai) is held by Institutions
- 樂鑫科技(上海)存在重要內部控制,表明在公司增長方面存在利益關係。
- 前4大股東擁有該公司的52%。
- 樂鑫科技(上海)27%的持股由機構持有。
Every investor in Espressif Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688018) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 43% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
持有樂鑫科技(上海)有限公司(SHSE:688018)股票的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東組。個體內部人員佔據了公司的最大股份,佔有43%的股份。換句話說,該組面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥515m last week.
顯然,內部人員在上週公司市值增加51500萬人民幣後受益最大。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Espressif Systems (Shanghai).
讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東對樂鑫科技(上海)有什麼影響。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Espressif Systems (Shanghai)?
機構持股告訴我們關於樂鑫科技(上海)的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that Espressif Systems (Shanghai) does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Espressif Systems (Shanghai)'s earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到,樂鑫科技(上海)確實擁有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的很大一部分股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析員已經審視了該股票並且喜歡它。但是就像其他任何人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。如果多個機構同時改變他們對股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面的樂鑫科技(上海)收入歷史記錄。當然,未來才是真正的關鍵。
Espressif Systems (Shanghai) is not owned by hedge funds. The company's CEO Swee Ann Teo is the largest shareholder with 43% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 3.6% and 2.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
樂鑫科技(上海)不是由對沖基金持有。公司的首席執行官Swee Ann Teo是最大的股東,持有43%的股份。同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有3.6%和2.9%的流通股。
On looking further, we found that 52% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
進一步觀察發現,前四名股東持有52%的股份。換句話說,這些股東對該公司的決策有重要的發言權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。
Insider Ownership Of Espressif Systems (Shanghai)
樂鑫科技(上海)的內部人員持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Espressif Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥5.0b worth of shares in the CN¥12b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人員擁有樂鑫科技(上海)有限公司的相當比例。內部人員持有CN¥50億的股票,超過了總市值CN¥120億公司的3成。這是相當有意義的。大多數人都會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望訪問此免費圖表,以查看內部人員的最新交易。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 24% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Espressif Systems (Shanghai). While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
擁有24%的持股量,主要由個人投資者組成的普通公衆在樂鑫科技(上海)擁有一定的影響力。雖然這種持股規模可能不足以影響他們的政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響.
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 6.2%, of the Espressif Systems (Shanghai) stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
私人公司擁有樂鑫科技(上海)6.2%的股份。私人公司可能是相關方。有時,內部人員通過私有公司持有公共公司的利益,而不是以其本身作爲個人的名義。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意作爲進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Espressif Systems (Shanghai) better, we need to consider many other factors.
總是值得考慮了解公司持股的不同團體。但是,要更好地了解樂鑫科技(上海),我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。