Should You Be Impressed By Talen Energy Corporation's (NASDAQ:TLN) ROE?
Should You Be Impressed By Talen Energy Corporation's (NASDAQ:TLN) ROE?
While some investors are already well versed in financial metrics (hat tip), this article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE) and why it is important. To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand Talen Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:TLN).
雖然一些投資者已經熟悉金融指標(鳴謝),但這篇文章是爲那些想學習回報率(ROE)的人而寫的。爲了使課程更加實用,我們將使用ROE來更好地了解Talen Energy Corporation(NASDAQ:TLN)。
ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. In simpler terms, it measures the profitability of a company in relation to shareholder's equity.
roe指股東權益回報率,是一種有用的工具,用於評估公司如何有效地從股東獲得的投資中產生回報。簡單來說,這衡量了一家公司相對於股東權益的盈利能力。
How To Calculate Return On Equity?
如何計算股東權益報酬率?
The formula for return on equity is:
權益回報率的計算公式是:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
淨資產收益率 = 淨利潤(從持續經營中獲得)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Talen Energy is:
因此,根據上述公式,Talen Energy的ROE爲:
32% = US$881m ÷ US$2.8b (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2024).
32% = 8,8100萬美元 ÷ 28億美元(截至2024年3月12個月)。
The 'return' is the profit over the last twelve months. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.32 in profit.
“回報率”是過去12個月的利潤。可以將其概念化爲,對於每1美元股東資本,公司獲得了0.32美元的利潤。
Does Talen Energy Have A Good Return On Equity?
Talen Energy的回報率如何?
Arguably the easiest way to assess company's ROE is to compare it with the average in its industry. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. As is clear from the image below, Talen Energy has a better ROE than the average (5.1%) in the Renewable Energy industry.
可以說,評估公司的ROE最簡單的方法是將其與行業平均水平進行比較。這明顯不是一種完美的衡量方法,因爲在同一行業分類中,公司存在顯著差異。正如下面的圖像所清楚地顯示的那樣,Talen Energy的ROE比可再生能源行業的平均水平(5.1%)更好。
That's clearly a positive. However, bear in mind that a high ROE doesn't necessarily indicate efficient profit generation. A higher proportion of debt in a company's capital structure may also result in a high ROE, where the high debt levels could be a huge risk . To know the 3 risks we have identified for Talen Energy visit our risks dashboard for free.
這顯然是一種積極的情況。但是,請記住,高ROE並不一定表明高效的利潤生成。公司資本結構中債務比例更高可能也會導致高ROE,其中高債務水平可能是巨大的風險。要了解我們爲Talen Energy確定的3個風險,請免費訪問我們的風險儀表板。
How Does Debt Impact ROE?
債務對ROE的影響是怎樣的?
Companies usually need to invest money to grow their profits. That cash can come from retained earnings, issuing new shares (equity), or debt. In the case of the first and second options, the ROE will reflect this use of cash, for growth. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. Thus the use of debt can improve ROE, albeit along with extra risk in the case of stormy weather, metaphorically speaking.
公司通常需要投資以增加其利潤。這種資金可以來自留存收益、新發行的股票(權益)或債務。對於前兩種選擇,ROE將反映這種資金的用途,以期實現增長。在後一種選擇中,用於增長的債務將提高回報率,但不會影響總淨資產。因此,債務的使用可以提高ROE,但在像雨後春筍般發展的情況下,這也將伴隨着額外的風險。
Talen Energy's Debt And Its 32% ROE
Talen Energy的債務和其32%的ROE
Although Talen Energy does use debt, its debt to equity ratio of 0.95 is still low. The combination of modest debt and a very impressive ROE does suggest that the business is high quality. Judicious use of debt to improve returns can certainly be a good thing, although it does elevate risk slightly and reduce future optionality.
儘管Talen Energy使用債務,但其資產負債比0.95仍然較低。適度使用債務以改善回報率當然是一件好事,儘管它會略微增加風險並減少未來選擇權。
Conclusion
結論
Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. In our books, the highest quality companies have high return on equity, despite low debt. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.
對於比較不同業務質量的公司,ROE很有用。在我們的書中,最高質量的公司具有高ROE,儘管其債務較低。如果兩家公司的債務與股本比例大致相同,並且其中一家公司的ROE更高,我通常更喜歡ROE更高的那家公司。
But ROE is just one piece of a bigger puzzle, since high quality businesses often trade on high multiples of earnings. Profit growth rates, versus the expectations reflected in the price of the stock, are a particularly important to consider. So you might want to check this FREE visualization of analyst forecasts for the company.
但是roe只是更大難題中的一部分,因爲高質量的企業通常以高市盈率交易。考慮到股票價格所反映的預期,利潤增長率尤爲重要。因此,您可能需要查看該公司分析師預測的免費可視化工具。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.
如果您想查看另一家可能具有更好財務狀況的公司 - 具有高股本回報率和低債務的公司,那麼請不要錯過這份有趣公司列表,該列表免費提供。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。