Great Week for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:OPEN) Institutional Investors After Losing 36% Over the Previous Year
Great Week for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:OPEN) Institutional Investors After Losing 36% Over the Previous Year
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Opendoor Technologies' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders have sold recently
- 機構持有股權較高意味着Opendoor Technologies的股價對機構的交易行爲敏感。
- 共有13位投資者持有該公司51%的所有權。
- 近期內有內部人士出售股票
A look at the shareholders of Opendoor Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:OPEN) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 60% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看Opendoor Technologies Inc.(NASDAQ:OPEN)的股東,就可以知道哪個團體最強大。持有公司最多股份的團體,確切來說是約60%的機構。換句話說,該團體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Last week's US$353m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 36% losses.
上週Opendoor Technologies的市值增加了35300萬美元,這可能會得到機構投資者的讚賞,特別是在一年虧損36%之後。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Opendoor Technologies.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對Opendoor Technologies(開放公司)能提供什麼信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Opendoor Technologies?
機構持有說明Opendoor Technologies的股票受到了相當一部分機構分析師的歡迎。當然,他們也可能是錯的。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,了解Opendoor Technologies的收益歷史很重要。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Opendoor Technologies. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Opendoor Technologies' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
納斯達克:OPEN收入和盈利增長2024年7月19日
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Opendoor Technologies. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 13%. With 7.8% and 7.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, Access Industries, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Carrie Wheeler directly holds 2.2% of the total shares outstanding.
Opendoor Technologies的內部持股人。我們可以報告說,內部人員確實擁有Opendoor Technologies Inc.的股份。這是一家大型公司,所以看到這種程度的一致性很好。內部人員持有價值6700萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內部人員一致性的問題,可以單擊此處查看內部人員是否一直在買賣。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的所有權數據的進一步研究表明,前13大股東擁有51%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Opendoor Technologies
我們可以看到私人公司擁有已發行股份的7.8%。私人公司可能是相關方。有時,內部人員通過持有私人公司而不是以個人身份持有公共公司來對公共公司產生利益。儘管難以得出任何廣泛的結論,但還是值得注意作爲進一步研究的一個方面。
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Opendoor Technologies Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$67m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我覺得看看一個公司到底是誰擁有很有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如風險- Opendoor Technologies有3個警告信號,我們認爲您應該了解一下。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 29% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
雖然考慮到擁有一家公司的不同集團是值得的,但還有更重要的因素。比如:我們已經發現了一條辛蒙斯第一國家銀行的警告信號,你應該知道。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 7.8%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們可以看到私人公司持有已發行股份的7.8%。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時內部人員通過持有私人公司的股份而不是以個人的身份對一家公開公司產生利益。儘管很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意作爲後續研究的一個領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Opendoor Technologies has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
Opendoor Technologies的私人公司。我們可以看到私人公司擁有已發行股份的7.8%。私人公司可能是相關方。有時,內部人員通過持有私人公司而不是以個人身份持有公共公司來對公共公司產生利益。儘管難以得出任何廣泛的結論,但還是值得注意作爲進一步研究的一個方面。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。