share_log

Public Companies Are Lufax Holding Ltd's (NYSE:LU) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped US$115m

Public Companies Are Lufax Holding Ltd's (NYSE:LU) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped US$115m

公共公司是陸金所控股有限公司(紐交所:LU)最大的股東,市值下跌1.15億美元后受到影響。
Simply Wall St ·  07/19 10:26

Key Insights

主要見解

  • The considerable ownership by public companies in Lufax Holding indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 68% ownership
  • Institutions own 18% of Lufax Holding
  • 陸金所公共公司的持股數量相當大,這意味着它們在管理和業務策略上有更大的發言權。
  • 2名投資者持有公司的68%的所有權。
  • 機構持有陸金所18%的股權。

A look at the shareholders of Lufax Holding Ltd (NYSE:LU) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are public companies with 41% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

觀察陸金所控股股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最爲強大。佔有41%所有權的公共公司是最大的股東。這意味着,如果該股票上漲(或在低迷期間失利),此集團將獲得最大利益(或失去最多)。

And following last week's 6.8% decline in share price, public companies suffered the most losses.

在上週股價下跌6.8%後,公共公司遭受了最大的損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Lufax Holding.

下面的圖表展示了陸金所的不同股權集團。

big
NYSE:LU Ownership Breakdown July 19th 2024
紐交所陸金所股權結構於2024年7月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lufax Holding?

機構所有權對陸金所有什麼影響?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Lufax Holding already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Lufax Holding's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

陸金所已經有機構投資者在股權登記表上。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中擁有一定的信譽度。但是,最好不要過於依賴機構投資者所謂的認證。他們也有時會犯錯。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總有一種可能性是他們在一場“擁擠的交易”中。當這樣的交易出錯時,多個方面可能競相快速出售股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以查看陸金所的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住故事背後總有更多的東西。

big
NYSE:LU Earnings and Revenue Growth July 19th 2024
紐交所陸金所收益和營收增長於2024年7月19日

Lufax Holding is not owned by hedge funds. Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 41% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 27% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 2.1% by the third-largest shareholder.

陸金所並不是由對沖基金持有的。中國平安保險(集團)股份有限公司是目前該公司最大的股東,持有41%的流通股。作爲參考,第二大股東持有流通股的約27%,第三大股東則持有2.1%的股權。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 68% stake.

股東登記表的更詳細研究顯示,前兩大股東通過持有該公司68%的股份擁有相當數量的所有權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Lufax Holding

陸金所的內部持有情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然“內部人士”的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Not all jurisdictions have the same rules around disclosing insider ownership, and it is possible we have missed something, here. So you can click here learn more about the CEO.

看起來,私營企業擁有安徽皖能電力股票的58%。這值得深入挖掘。如果相關方,如內部人士,在其中一傢俬營企業中擁有利益,那麼應該在年度報告中披露。私人企業也可能對公司有戰略利益。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Lufax Holding. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

通常是個體投資者的普通公衆持有陸金所的14%的股份。雖然相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 27%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有該公司的27%股份。私人公司可能是相關方。有時內部人員通過控股私人公司而不是以個人身份來擁有公共公司的利益。儘管很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意作爲進一步研究的領域。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

We can see that public companies hold 41% of the Lufax Holding shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

我們可以看到公共公司持有陸金所已發行股份的41%。很難確定,但這表明他們有交織的商業利益。這可能是一個戰略性的股份,因此值得關注該領域的股權變化。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Lufax Holding better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Lufax Holding .

在考慮擁有公司股份的不同集團時,了解陸金所還需要考慮許多其他因素。因此,您應該知道我們在陸金所發現的一個警告跡象。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論