Abacus Life, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ABL): Co-President Matthew Ganovsky Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 17% Last Week
Abacus Life, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ABL): Co-President Matthew Ganovsky Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 17% Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Abacus Life's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 內部人士看起來對於Abacus Life的成長抱有極大的興趣,這可以從他們持有的大量股權看出。
- 總計3名投資者持有該公司51%的所有權。
- 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Abacus Life, Inc. (NASDAQ:ABL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 83% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
爲了了解Abacus Life, Inc. (NASDAQ:ABL)的真正掌控者,我們需要了解業務的所有權結構。我們可以看到,個人內部人士持有該公司83%的股權。也就是說,如果股票上漲(或下跌),這群人將獲得最大的利益(或承受最大的損失)。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by US$112m last week.
顯然,在上週,當公司市值增長了1,1200萬美元后,內部人士受益最多。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Abacus Life, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究Abacus Life的每種所有權類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240720/0-9bd61fc37b22e962e1f93cd2bfc999f5-0-2d5be1b61be7b1cbbbabecff2874d647.png/big)
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Abacus Life?
缺乏機構投資者所有權對於Abacus Life意味着什麼?
Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.
機構不擁有股票的原因有多種解釋。最常見的是公司相對於管理基金過小,因此機構不必仔細審查公司。也有可能是基金經理人不持有股票,因爲他們不確信該股票表現良好。機構投資者可能並不認爲該業務的歷史增長令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。您可以自己看到Zibuyu Group的過去營業收入表現。
There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Abacus Life, for yourself, below.
許多公司不擁有任何機構股東,原因是:流動性 (每天交易的股票數量) 較低,因此機構無法購買大量股票;如果公司沒有需要融資,機構可能缺乏建立頭寸的機會;基金經理也可能因爲不相信該公司的表現而不持有該股票;機構投資者可能認爲該公司的歷史增長表現不令人印象深刻,或者可能存在其他因素。您可以在下面看到Abacus Life的歷史營業收入表現。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240720/0-9bd61fc37b22e962e1f93cd2bfc999f5-1-328416d11f4e9f767e910ada16d11b41.png/big)
Abacus Life is not owned by hedge funds. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is Matthew Ganovsky (who also holds the title of Co-President) with 17% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. The second and third largest shareholders are Kevin Kirby and Todd McNealy, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 17%. Note that two of the top three shareholders are also Co-President and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively, once again pointing to significant ownership by company insiders. In addition, we found that Jay Jackson, the CEO has 17% of the shares allocated to their name.
Abacus Life不是由對沖基金持有的,根據數據,我們推斷最大的股東是股份未流通的聯合總裁Matthew Ganovsky,持有17%的股份。 內部人士持有公司大量股權一般被視爲好兆頭,在這種情況下,我們很高興看到一位公司內部人士扮演關鍵利益相關者的角色。 第二和第三大股東分別是Kevin Kirby和Todd McNealy,持有相同數量的股份,均爲17%。 請注意,最高股東中的三位,在公司中分別擔任聯合總裁和董事會成員,並再次指向內部人士擁有大量的公司所有權。此外,我們發現首席執行官Jay Jackson擁有分配給他們的17%的股份。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 51% stake.
股東登記簿的更詳細研究表明,前三大股東擁有51%的股權,其所有權相當重要。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
雖然研究公司的機構持股可以增加研究價值,但研究分析師建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一個好習慣。該股票的一些分析人士需要更多的關注時間。
Insider Ownership Of Abacus Life
Abacus Life的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
It seems that insiders own more than half the Abacus Life, Inc. stock. This gives them a lot of power. So they have a US$519m stake in this US$626m business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
看來內部人士持有Abacus Life, Inc.股票的比例超過一半。這使得他們擁有很大的權力。因此,他們在這家市值6260萬美元的公司中擁有5190萬美元的股份。大多數人會很高興看到董事會也在投資。您可以免費發現他們是否一直在購買或出售股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 17% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Abacus Life. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
佔有17%的個人投資者(即普通公衆)在Abacus Life中有一定的影響力。雖然這種所有權可能不足以在政策決策方面產生影響,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 5 warning signs for Abacus Life (2 shouldn't be ignored) that you should be aware of.
我非常有興趣了解公司的實際所有者。但是,要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已確定Abacus Life存在5個警示信號(其中2個不應被忽視),您應該了解它們。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。