share_log

Eli Lilly (NYSE:LLY) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

Eli Lilly (NYSE:LLY) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

伊利莎白·莉莉(NYSE:LLY)似乎相當明智地使用債務。
Simply Wall St ·  07/20 10:05

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE:LLY) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:“波動性與風險遠非同義詞。” 因此,當您考慮任何給定股票有多大風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。我們可以看到,禮來公司(NYSE:LLY)在其業務中確實使用債務。但是,股東們是否應該擔心它的債務使用?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時有危險?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

當企業無法輕鬆通過自由現金流或以優惠的價格籌集資金來履行債務和其他負債時,債務和其他負債將對企業構成風險。創業板的一部分是“創造性破壞”的過程,其中由其銀行家無情清算失敗的企業。然而,更常見的(但仍然昂貴的)情況是,一家公司必須以便宜的股價稀釋股東,只是爲了控制債務。然而,通過取代股權稀釋,債務可以成爲那些需要資金以高投資回報率進行增長的企業的極好工具。在考慮債務水平時,我們首先考慮現金和債務水平。

What Is Eli Lilly's Net Debt?

禮來的淨債務是多少?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of March 2024 Eli Lilly had US$26.3b of debt, an increase on US$19.0b, over one year. However, it does have US$2.65b in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$23.7b.

您可以點擊下面的圖形查看歷史數據,但它顯示,截至2024年3月,禮來有263億美元的債務,較去年增加了19億美元。然而,它有26.5億美元的現金抵消這筆債務,導致淨債務約爲237億美元。

big
NYSE:LLY Debt to Equity History July 20th 2024
NYSE:LLY的權益與負債歷史。2024年7月20日

How Healthy Is Eli Lilly's Balance Sheet?

禮來公司的資產負債表健康狀況如何?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Eli Lilly had liabilities of US$18.6b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$32.4b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$2.65b in cash and US$9.87b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$38.5b.

專注於最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到禮來有186億美元的負債在12個月內到期,而超過這一期限的負債爲324億美元。抵消這一點的是,它有26.5億美元的現金和98.7億美元的應收賬款,這些是在12個月內到期的。因此,其負債超過現金和(短期)應收款項的總和385億美元。

Given Eli Lilly has a humongous market capitalization of US$764.4b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.

考慮到禮來的巨額市值爲7644億美元,很難相信這些負債會構成多大的威脅。話雖如此,顯然我們應繼續監測其資產負債表,以免情況惡化。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我們通過將公司的淨債務與其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)相除,並計算其息稅前利潤(EBIT)如何覆蓋其利息費用(利息覆蓋率)來衡量公司的債務負擔相對於其盈利能力。因此,我們同時考慮債務的絕對數量以及所支付的利率。

We'd say that Eli Lilly's moderate net debt to EBITDA ratio ( being 1.8), indicates prudence when it comes to debt. And its strong interest cover of 31.3 times, makes us even more comfortable. It is well worth noting that Eli Lilly's EBIT shot up like bamboo after rain, gaining 53% in the last twelve months. That'll make it easier to manage its debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Eli Lilly's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

我們可以說,禮來公司適度的淨債務至稅息折舊及攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)比率(爲1.8),表明其在債務方面非常謹慎。其強大的利息覆蓋率達到31.3倍,讓我們甚至更加放心。值得注意的是,最近12個月,禮來公司的EBIT逐漲,增長了53%。這將使其更容易管理其債務。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是明顯的起點。但與其說是資產負債表,不如說是未來的盈利將更多地決定禮來公司維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看這份免費的分析報告,其中包含分析師的利潤預測。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, Eli Lilly recorded free cash flow of 26% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.

最後,雖然稅務人員可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸款人只接受冷酷的現金。因此,邏輯上應該查看與實際自由現金流匹配的EBIT的比例。查看最近三年,禮來公司錄得的自由現金流佔EBIT的比例爲26%,這比我們預期的要弱。在償還債務方面並不理想。

Our View

我們的觀點

Happily, Eli Lilly's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But truth be told we feel its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow does undermine this impression a bit. Taking all this data into account, it seems to us that Eli Lilly takes a pretty sensible approach to debt. That means they are taking on a bit more risk, in the hope of boosting shareholder returns. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Eli Lilly that you should be aware of.

令人欣慰的是,禮來公司令人印象深刻的利息覆蓋率表明它具有掌控債務的優勢。但實話實說,我們認爲其將EBIT轉換爲自由現金流的能力有些削弱這種印象。綜合考慮所有這些數據,我們認爲禮來公司在處理債務方面採取了相當明智的做法。這意味着他們承擔了更多的風險,希望提高股東的回報率。顯示公司資產負債表的內容,很清楚這是分析債務時需要關注的領域。然而,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中——遠非如此。例如,我們已經發現了兩個警告信號,您應該了解它們。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

說到底,有時更容易關注那些甚至不需要債務的公司。讀者可以免費查看零淨債務增長股票列表,立即獲得。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論